...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian family physician >Two new aspects of continuity of care
【24h】

Two new aspects of continuity of care

机译:护理连续性的两个新方面

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To determine whether the original continuity of care framework is still applicable to family medicine today. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Setting Kingston, Ont. Participants Three groups of first-year family medicine residents (18 in total), 2 groups of family physicians in established comprehensive practices (9 in total), and 2 groups of family physicians working in episodic care settings (10 in total). Methods Using focus groups, a semistructured discussion guide, and a qualitative descriptive design, we explored the residents’ and practising physicians’ conceptions about continuity of care. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify themes. Main findings Focus group participants consisting of family physicians providing comprehensive care, episodic care physicians, and family medicine residents exposed 2 new dimensions of continuity of care— community continuity of care (the physicians’ roles in understanding the lives of their patients, and how this affects their overall health) and continuity of care within the health care team (the continuity between a patient and members of the interprofessional team, including the family physician). Geographic continuity of care (the care of a patient in various settings by the same physician) was not prominently discussed, perhaps reflecting the paucity of family physicians in the hospital setting. Conclusion Both of these new dimensions of continuity of care are consistent with the ongoing evolution of family medicine as a discipline, and have important implications for how family medicine training programs should be designed to best prepare trainees for future practice.
机译:目的确定最初的医疗保健连续性框架是否仍适用于当今的家庭医学。设计定性描述性研究。设置金斯顿,安大略省。参与者三组第一年家庭医学住院医师(总共18名),两组已建立综合实践的家庭医生(共9名)和2组在情景护理环境中工作的家庭医生(共10名)。方法通过使用焦点小组,半结构化的讨论指南和定性的描述性设计,我们探讨了住院医师和执业医师对医疗连续性的观念。定性内容分析用于识别主题。主要发现主要由提供全面护理的家庭医生,病情护理医生和家庭医学居民组成的焦点小组参与者暴露了护理连续性的两个新方面-社区连续性护理(医生在理解患者生活中的作用以及如何影响他们的整体健康)和医疗团队内的护理连续性(患者与跨专业团队成员(包括家庭医生)之间的连续性)。护理的地域连续性(由同一位医生在各种环境下对患者的护理)并未得到重点讨论,这可能反映了家庭医生在医院环境中的匮乏。结论护理连续性的这两个新方面都与家庭医学作为一门学科的不断发展相一致,并且对如何设计家庭医学培训计划以最佳地培训受训者未来的实践具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号