首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma >Pattern and Distribution of Shock Index and Age Shock Index Score Among Trauma Patients in Towards Improved Trauma Care Outcomes (TITCO) Dataset
【24h】

Pattern and Distribution of Shock Index and Age Shock Index Score Among Trauma Patients in Towards Improved Trauma Care Outcomes (TITCO) Dataset

机译:旨在改善创伤护理结果(TITCO)数据的创伤患者中冲击指数和年龄冲击指数得分的模式和分布

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To compare the shock index (SI a?? which is the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure) and Age SI (Age in years multiplied by SI) with survival outcome of the patients across multicenter trauma registry in India.Methods: Study is based on Towards Improved Trauma Care Outcomes (TITCO) project. Records with valid details of age, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, Injury Severity Scale (ISS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was considered. SI was categorized into four groups; Group I (SI0.6) as no shock, group II (SI a?¥0.6 to 1.0) as mild shock, group III (SI a?¥1.0 to 1.4) as moderate shock and group IV (SI a?¥1.4) as severe shock. Age SI was categorized decade wise into six groups. Mortality was dependent variable. GCS and ISS were considered as secondary variables.Results: 10843 participants from TITCO registry satisfying inclusion-exclusion criteria were considered for study. Mean SI score in group I to IV was increasing with 0.53 to 1.72 respectively. Age SI was seen to be increasing across its six groups. Gender wise no difference was found among SI group. For severe ISS and critical ISS, mortality in SI group IV was 50% and 56 % respectively. Mortality was increasing across mild to severe GCS among all SI groups.Conclusion: The categorized SI and Age SI had shown increase in death percentages from mild to severe severity of injuries. Similar to GCS and ISS, SI and Age SI should also be calculated and categorized in all health care and further plan for management aspects.
机译:目的:比较印度多中心创伤登记处的休克指数(SI a ??是心率与收缩压之比)和年龄SI(年纪乘以SI)与患者的生存结局。该研究基于“改善创伤护理结果”(TITCO)项目。考虑具有年龄,心率,收缩压,损伤严重程度量表(ISS)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分的有效细节的记录。 SI分为四类:第一组(SI <0.6)为无电击,第二组(SI a?0.6至<1.0)为轻度电击,第三组(SI a?¥ 1.0至<1.4)为中度电击,第四组(SI a?¥ 1.4)严重震动。年龄SI被按十年分为六类。死亡率是因变量。结果:将TITCO注册处的10843名符合纳入-排除标准的参与者纳入研究范围。 I至IV组的平均SI评分分别提高了0.53至1.72。六年龄组的SI年龄正在增加。在性别方面,SI组之间没有差异。对于重度ISS和重度ISS,IV组SI的死亡率分别为50%和56%。在所有SI组中,从轻度到重度GCS的死亡率都在增加。结论:SI和Age SI的分类显示了从轻度到重度伤害的死亡百分比增加。与GCS和ISS相似,SI和Age SI也应在所有医疗保健中进行计算和分类,并制定管理方面的进一步计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号