首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Medical Practitioners >A survey of aseptic technique when performing lumbar puncture: a comparison of medical and anaesthetic trainees
【24h】

A survey of aseptic technique when performing lumbar puncture: a comparison of medical and anaesthetic trainees

机译:腰椎穿刺时无菌技术的调查:医学和麻醉学学员的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim:To compare infection control measures taken by anaesthetic and acute medical trainees when performing lumbar puncture. Methods:An online anonymous survey was sent to 50 anaesthetic and 50 acute medical trainees currently in training posts. Information on compliance with infection control measures was gathered. Results:The response rate was 71% (40/50 anaesthetic trainees, 31/50 medical trainees). All anaesthetic trainees complied with the components of aseptic technique. In comparison to this, only 80.6% of medical trainees used sterile gloves, 38.7% used an apron and 77.4% used a dressing pack. Conclusions:Levels of infection control during lumbar puncture differ between anaesthetic and medical trainees, particularly with the use of equipment as part of an aseptic technique. The difference is likely to be due to a combination of factors including training and the clinical environment.
机译:目的:比较麻醉和急性医学实习生在进行腰穿时采取的感染控制措施。方法:在线匿名调查被发送给目前在培训岗位上的50名麻醉药和50名急性医学培训生。收集了有关遵守感染控制措施的信息。结果:响应率为71%(40/50名麻醉学员,31/50名医疗学员)。所有麻醉学员均符合无菌技术的要求。与此相比,只有80.6%的医学培训生使用了无菌手套,38.7%的使用了围裙,77.4%的使用了敷料包。结论:麻醉和医学实习生在腰椎穿刺过程中的感染控制水平有所不同,特别是使用设备作为无菌技术的一部分时。差异可能是由于包括培训和临床环境在内的多种因素造成的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号