首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma >Assessing Preparedness of Non-Hospital Health Centers to Provide Primary Emergency Care; A Systematic Review
【24h】

Assessing Preparedness of Non-Hospital Health Centers to Provide Primary Emergency Care; A Systematic Review

机译:评估非医院保健中心提供初级紧急护理的准备情况;系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: To identify prevalent domains related to the concept of assessing preparedness of non-hospital centers to provide primary emergency care in order to develop a comprehensive framework.Methods: Five databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, Barakat Knowledge Network Systems (BKNS) and Scientific Information Database (SID) were searched in English and/or Persian languages with no time limit until March, 2018. Manual search and grey literature were also done. According to the eligibility criteria, all the studies were independently tracked by two researchers. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). The findings were synthesized through directed content analysis method.Results: Out of 3014 studies, 15 studies were included for data synthesis. The synthesis of literature resulted in the emergence of 13 domains and 25 sub-domains. Then, they were categorized based on Donabediana??s triple model and a conceptual framework was developed. In this framework, 6 domains were put in input, 6 in processes, and 1 domain in outcome. Of the 15 included studies, 1 study considered 10 domains and 14 other studies considered 4 to 8 domains out of 13 synthesized domains. The most prevalent synthesized domains were a??medical supplies and equipmenta?? and a??human resourcesa??, which were considered in 15 studies.Conclusion: In this study, a conceptual framework was constructed that identifies elements that significantly affect the preparedness of these centers. This framework may assist managers to take a comprehensive approach to assess these centers.
机译:目的:确定与评估非医院中心准备提供初级急救服务的观念有关的普遍领域,以开发一个综合框架。方法:五个数据库,包括PubMed,Scopus,Web of Science,Barakat知识网络系统(BKNS) )和科学信息数据库(SID)以英语和/或波斯语言进行搜索,直到2018年3月为止没有时间限制。还进行了手动搜索和灰色文献。根据资格标准,所有研究均由两名研究人员独立跟踪。使用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)对研究进行评估。结果:通过定向内容分析方法进行了综合。结果:在3014项研究中,有15项研究用于数据综合。文献的综合导致出现了13个域和25个子域。然后,根据Donabediana的三元模型对它们进行分类,并开发了概念框架。在此框架中,将6个域放入输入中,将6个域放入流程中,将1个域放入结果中。在15项纳入研究中,一项研究考虑了10个域,而其他14项研究考虑了13个合成域中的4至8个域。最普遍的合成领域是“医疗用品和设备”。结论:在这项研究中,构建了一个概念框架,该框架确定了会严重影响这些中心的准备工作的要素。该框架可以帮助管理人员采取综合方法评估这些中心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号