首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Medicine and Medical Research >Evaluation of Commercial Rapid Diagnostic Test Kit for Tuberculosis: Further Evidence Supporting Negative Policy on the Use of Serological Tests for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Developing Countries
【24h】

Evaluation of Commercial Rapid Diagnostic Test Kit for Tuberculosis: Further Evidence Supporting Negative Policy on the Use of Serological Tests for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Diagnosis in Developing Countries

机译:评估结核病商业快速诊断检测试剂盒:进一步的证据支持在发展中国家使用血清学检测方法诊断肺结核的消极政策

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: To know whether one of the commercially available immunochromatographic tuberculosis tests is comparable with the widely available method, direct sputum microscopy. Design: The study prospectively validated the pulmonary tuberculosis rapid test kit using the reference standard, Lowenstein Jensen culture and compared the outcome with the direct sputum microscopy. Place and Duration: The study was conducted in Zankli Medical Centre, Abuja, between November 2004 and July 2005. Methodology: 340 patients from direct observation therapy clinics located in six different government owned health facilities were referred to our facility. These patients; male (192) and female (148) were between the age of 10 and 64 years old. Three sputa samples were collected over two consecutive days and direct microscopy and culture were performed on these samples. Also, 4ml of blood were collected from the same patients for antibody detection using immunochromatographic technique. Results: The evaluated rapid diagnostic kit when compared with the reference standard has a sensitivity of 59.3% and 81.1% specificity. Sensitivity and specificity of direct microscopy, when compared with the rapid test is statistically significant ( P =0.001); indicating diagnostic accuracy of the conventional method of pulmonary tuberculosis testing over the immunochromatographic test. Conclusions: The conventional test indicated high performance in this report and it is suggestive of the relevance and diagnostic accuracy of the widely available method in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in developing countries. This assertion is also, supported by the 2008 WHO/TDR report on evaluation of nineteen tuberculosis rapid diagnostic kits.
机译:目的:要了解一种市售的免疫层析结核试验是否可与广泛使用的直接痰镜检查法相提并论。设计:该研究使用参考标准Lowenstein Jensen培养物对肺结核快速检测试剂盒进行了前瞻性验证,并将结果与​​直接痰镜检查进行了比较。地点和持续时间:该研究于2004年11月至2005年7月在阿布贾的Zankli医疗中心进行。方法:将来自六个不同政府拥有卫生设施的直接观察疗法诊所的340名患者转诊至我们的设施。这些病人;男性(192)和女性(148)年龄在10到64岁之间。在连续两天中收集了三个痰液样品,并对这些样品进行直接显微镜检查和培养。另外,从同一患者中收集了4ml血液用于免疫色谱技术检测抗体。结果:与参考标准相比,所评估的快速诊断试剂盒的敏感性为59.3%,特异性为81.1%。与快速检测相比,直接显微镜的敏感性和特异性具有统计学意义(P = 0.001);表明常规肺结核检测方法比免疫色谱检测方法的诊断准确性。结论:常规测试在本报告中显示出高性能,这表明发展中国家广泛使用的方法在诊断肺结核中的相关性和诊断准确性。 2008年WHO / TDR关于评估19种结核病快速诊断试剂盒的报告也支持了这一主张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号