...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Efficacy and safety of pertussis vaccination for pregnant women – a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and observational studies
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of pertussis vaccination for pregnant women – a systematic review of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

机译:孕妇百日咳疫苗接种的有效性和安全性–随机对照试验和观察性研究的系统评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Worldwide, pertussis remains a major health problem among children. During the recent outbreaks of pertussis, maternal antenatal immunisation was introduced in several industrial countries. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence for the efficacy and safety of the pertussis vaccination that was given to pregnant women to protect infants from pertussis infection. We searched literature in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, and OpenGrey between inception of the various databases and 16 May 2016. The search terms included ‘pertussis’, ‘whooping cough’, ‘pertussis vaccine,’ ‘tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis vaccines’ and ‘pregnancy’ and ‘perinatal’. We included 15 articles in this review, which represented 12 study populations, involving a total of 203,835 mother-infant pairs from the US, the UK, Belgium, Israel, and Vietnam. Of the included studies, there were two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the rest were observational studies. Existing evidence suggests that vaccinations administered during 19–37?weeks of gestation are associated with significantly increased antibody levels in the blood of both mothers and their newborns at birth compared to placebo or no vaccination. However, there is a lack of robust evidence to suggest whether these increased antibodies can also reduce the incidence of pertussis (one RCT, n?=?48, no incidence in either group) and pertussis-related severe complications (one observational study) or mortality (no study) in infants. Meanwhile, there is no evidence of increased risk of serious complications such as stillbirth (e.g. one RCT, n?=?103, RR?=?0, meaning no case in the vaccine group), or preterm birth (two RCTs, n?=?151, RR?=?0.86, 95%CI: 0.14–5.21) related to administration of the vaccine during pregnancy. Given that pertussis infection is increasing in many countries and that newborn babies are at greatest risk of developing severe complications from pertussis, maternal vaccination in the later stages of pregnancy should continue to be supported while further research should fill knowledge gaps and strengthen evidence of its efficacy and safety.
机译:在世界范围内,百日咳仍然是儿童的主要健康问题。在最近的百日咳暴发期间,一些工业化国家引入了产妇产前免疫。这项系统的综述旨在综合证据,为孕妇提供百日咳疫苗接种的功效和安全性,以保护婴儿免受百日咳感染。我们在各种数据库启用至2016年5月16日之间,在Cochrane对照试验中央注册簿,Medline,Embase和OpenGrey中检索了文献。检索词包括“百日咳”,“咳嗽”,“百日咳疫苗”,“破伤风”,“白喉和百日咳疫苗”,“妊娠”和“围产期”。我们在这篇综述中纳入了15篇文章,代表12个研究人群,涉及来自美国,英国,比利时,以色列和越南的203,835对母婴。在纳入的研究中,有两项随机对照试验(RCT),其余为观察性研究。现有证据表明,与安慰剂或未接种疫苗相比,在妊娠19-37周内接种疫苗与母亲及其新生儿血液中的抗体水平显着增加有关。但是,缺乏有力的证据来证明这些增加的抗体是否还能降低百日咳的发生率(一项RCT,n?=?48,两组均无发生率)和与百日咳有关的严重并发症(一项观察性研究)或婴儿死亡率(无研究)。同时,没有证据表明发生死胎等严重并发症的风险增加(例如,一个RCT,n≥103,RR≥0,意味着疫苗组中没有病例)或早产(两个RCT,n≥3)。 =?151,RR?=?0.86,95%CI:0.14-5.21)与怀孕期间接种疫苗有关。鉴于许多国家的百日咳感染正在增加,新生婴儿面临百日咳引起的严重并发症的风险最大,因此应继续支持孕晚期的孕妇接种疫苗,同时应进行进一步的研究以填补知识空白并加强其有效性的证据和安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号