...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Microbiology >Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags
【24h】

Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags

机译:使用16S序列标签表征人类肠道细菌群落的采样和焦磷酸测序方法

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Intense interest centers on the role of the human gut microbiome in health and disease, but optimal methods for analysis are still under development. Here we present a study of methods for surveying bacterial communities in human feces using 454/Roche pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene tags. We analyzed fecal samples from 10 individuals and compared methods for storage, DNA purification and sequence acquisition. To assess reproducibility, we compared samples one cm apart on a single stool specimen for each individual. To analyze storage methods, we compared 1) immediate freezing at -80°C, 2) storage on ice for 24 or 3) 48 hours. For DNA purification methods, we tested three commercial kits and bead beating in hot phenol. Variations due to the different methodologies were compared to variation among individuals using two approaches--one based on presence-absence information for bacterial taxa (unweighted UniFrac) and the other taking into account their relative abundance (weighted UniFrac). In the unweighted analysis relatively little variation was associated with the different analytical procedures, and variation between individuals predominated. In the weighted analysis considerable variation was associated with the purification methods. Particularly notable was improved recovery of Firmicutes sequences using the hot phenol method. We also carried out surveys of the effects of different 454 sequencing methods (FLX versus Titanium) and amplification of different 16S rRNA variable gene segments. Based on our findings we present recommendations for protocols to collect, process and sequence bacterial 16S rDNA from fecal samples--some major points are 1) if feasible, bead-beating in hot phenol or use of the PSP kit improves recovery; 2) storage methods can be adjusted based on experimental convenience; 3) unweighted (presence-absence) comparisons are less affected by lysis method.
机译:强烈的兴趣集中在人类肠道微生物组在健康和疾病中的作用,但分析的最佳方法仍在开发中。在这里,我们介绍了使用454 /罗氏焦磷酸测序16S rRNA基因标签调查人类粪便中细菌群落的方法的研究。我们分析了10个人的粪便样本,并比较了存储,DNA纯化和序列采集的方法。为了评估可重复性,我们比较了每个人在单个粪便样本上相距一厘米的样本。为了分析存储方法,我们比较了1)在-80°C下立即冷冻,2)在冰上存储24或3)48小时。对于DNA纯化方法,我们测试了三种市售试剂盒和热酚中的珠子跳动。使用两种方法将由于不同方法导致的差异与个体差异进行比较-一种是基于细菌类群的不存在信息(未加权UniFrac),另一种是考虑到其相对丰度(加权UniFrac)。在未加权分析中,相对较少的差异与不同的分析程序相关,并且个体之间的差异占主导地位。在加权分析中,纯化方法存在很大差异。特别值得注意的是,使用热酚法提高了Firmicutes序列的回收率。我们还对不同454测序方法(FLX与钛)的影响以及不同16S rRNA可变基因片段的扩增进行了调查。根据我们的发现,我们提出了从粪便样品中收集,处理和测序细菌16S rDNA的方案的建议-一些要点是1)如果可行,在热酚中进行珠子敲打或使用PSP试剂盒可提高回收率; 2)可根据实验方便性调整存储方式; 3)未加权(存在-不存在)比较受裂解方法的影响较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号