...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery >Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
【24h】

Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil

机译:为什么要使用the动脉?隐静脉是巴西CABG的第二选择移植

获取原文
           

摘要

The saphenous vein (SV) is the most commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and the second conduit of choice in Brazil and many other countries. The radial artery (RA) is suggested, by some, to be superior to SV grafts, although its use in the USA declined over a 10 year period. The patency of SV grafts (SVG) is improved when the vein is harvested with minimal trauma using the no-touch (NT) technique. This improved performance is due to the preservation of the outer pedicle surrounding the SV and reduction in vascular damage that occurs when using conventional techniques (CT) of harvesting. While the patency of NT SVGs has been shown superior to the RA at 36 months in one study, data from the RADIAL trial suggests the RA to be the superior conduit. When additional data using NT SVG is included in this trial the difference in risk of graft occlusion between the RA and SV grafts dissipates with there no longer being a significant difference in patency between conduits. The importance of preserving SV structure and the impact of NT harvesting on conduit choice for CABG patients are discussed in this short review.
机译:隐静脉(SV)是最常用于冠状动脉搭桥手术(CABG)的导管,并且在巴西和许多其他国家中是第二选择的导管。有人建议动脉(RA)优于SV移植物,尽管在美国使用它的时间已超过10年。使用非接触式(NT)技术以最小的创伤收获静脉时,SV移植物(SVG)的通畅性得到改善。这种改进的性能归因于保留了SV周围的外部蒂,并且减少了使用常规收获技术(CT)时发生的血管损伤。尽管一项研究显示,在36个月时NT SVG的通畅性优于RA,但RADIAL试验的数据表明RA是上等导管。当在该试验中包括使用NT SVG的其他数据时,RA和SV移植物之间的移植物闭塞风险差异将消失,导管之间的通畅性不再存在显着差异。在这篇简短的评论中讨论了维持SV结构的重要性以及NT收集对CABG患者导管选择的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号