...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Disciplinary boundaries and integrating care: using Q-methodology to understand trainee views on being a good doctor
【24h】

Disciplinary boundaries and integrating care: using Q-methodology to understand trainee views on being a good doctor

机译:学科界限和综合护理:使用Q方法学来了解受训者对成为一名好医生的看法

获取原文
           

摘要

Rising numbers of patients with multiple-conditions and complex care needs mean that it is increasingly important for doctors from different specialty areas to work together, alongside other members of the multi-disciplinary team, to provide patient centred care. However, intra-professional boundaries and silos within the medical profession may challenge holistic approaches to patient care. We used Q methodology to examine how postgraduate trainees (n?=?38) on a range of different specialty programmes in England and Wales could be grouped based on their rankings of 40 statements about ‘being a good doctor’. Themes covered in the Q-set include: generalism (breadth) and specialism (depth), interdisciplinarity and multidisciplinary team working, patient-centredness, and managing complex care needs. A by-person factor analysis enabled us to map distinct perspectives within our participant group (P-set). Despite high levels of overall commonality, three groups of trainees emerged, each with a clear perspective on being a good doctor. We describe the first group as ‘generalists’: team-players with a collegial and patient-centred approach to their role. The second group of ‘general specialists’ aspired to be specialists but with a generalist and patient-centred approach to care within their specialty area. Both these two groups can be contrasted to those in the third ‘specialist’ group, who had a more singular focus on how their specialty can help the patient. Whilst distinct, the priorities and values of trainees in this study share some important aspects. The results of our Q-sort analysis suggest that it may be helpful to understand the relationship between generalism and specialism as less of a dichotomy and more of a continuum that transcends primary and secondary care settings. A nuanced understanding of trainee views on being a good doctor, across different specialties, may help us to bridge gaps and foster interdisciplinary working.
机译:具有多种情况和复杂护理需求的患者人数不断增加,这意味着来自不同专业领域的医生与多学科团队的其他成员一起提供以患者为中心的护理越来越重要。但是,医学界内的专业内部界限和孤岛可能对患者护理的整体方法提出挑战。我们使用Q方法研究了英格兰和威尔士一系列不同专业课程的研究生(n?=?38),如何根据他们对“成为一名好医生”的40条陈述进行排名。 Q集中涵盖的主题包括:通识(广度)和专长(深度),跨学科和多学科团队合作,以患者为中心以及管理复杂护理需求。通过逐项因素分析,我们可以在参与者组(P集)中绘制不同的观点。尽管总体上具有很高的共通性,但还是出现了三组学员,每组学员对成为一名好医生都有清晰的认识。我们将第一个小组描述为“一般主义者”:团队合作者,以协作和以患者为中心的方法来扮演角色。第二组“普通专家”渴望成为专家,但在其专业领域内采用通才和以患者为中心的护理方法。这两个小组可以与第三个“专家”小组中的人形成对比,后者在他们的专长如何帮助患者方面更加单一。尽管截然不同,但本研究中受训人员的优先事项和价值观具有一些重要方面。我们的Q-sort分析结果表明,了解通才和专长​​之间的关系可能会有所帮助,因为这不再是二分法,而是更多的超越初级和二级护理环境的连续体。对受训者关于成为不同专业的好医生的观点的细微理解可能会帮助我们弥合差距并促进跨学科工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号