首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Application of propensity scores to explore the effect of public reporting of medicine use information on rational drug use in China: a quasi-experimental design
【24h】

Application of propensity scores to explore the effect of public reporting of medicine use information on rational drug use in China: a quasi-experimental design

机译:倾向得分的应用探讨公共用药信息公开报告对中国合理用药的影响:准实验设计

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Transparency has become a hottest topic and a growing movement in the health care system worldwide. This study used a quasi-experimental design method to explore whether public reporting of medicine use information can improve rational drug use. Methods 20 township hospitals and 274 doctors of City Y in Hubei Province, China were divided into the intervention and control groups on the basis of their characteristics. In the intervention group, the values and rankings of the average expenditure per prescription, percentage of prescriptions requiring antibiotics and percentage of prescriptions requiring injections of each hospital and doctor were publicly released to patients and doctors in an appropriate format monthly. Data were gathered both four months before and after the intervention. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the observed covariate (gender, age, experience, education level, title, and monthly income) differences in the doctors’ characteristics. 108 pairs of doctors were obtained after PSM. Chi-square test and t-test were employed to explore the effect of public reporting of medicine use information on rational drug use. The study was approved by the Committee of Tongji Medical College, Hua Zhong University of Science and Technology (IORG No: IORG0003571). Results In baseline, the average expenditure per prescription of the 274 doctors was 42.82 RMB yuan (USD 6.97), the percentage of prescriptions requiring antibiotics was 63.00%, and the percentage of prescriptions requiring injections was 70.79%, all higher than the average of Hubei Province and the standard recommended by WHO. Before the intervention all the three indicators were all comparable (p > 0.05), whereas after the intervention, a significant difference (p Conclusions Irrational drug use remains a policy issue in township hospitals in the study area. We demonstrated that publicly reporting medicine use information could decrease the percentage of prescriptions requiring injections in township hospitals in China, but this effect was not observed on prescription costs and antibiotics use. Analyses of the mechanism and long-term effect of public reporting of medicine use information are recommended for further studies.
机译:背景技术透明度已经成为全球医疗保健系统中最热门的话题和日益增长的趋势。这项研究采用了一种准实验设计方法,以探讨公开报告用药信息是否可以改善合理用药情况。方法将湖北省Y市20所乡镇卫生院和274名医生按其特点分为干预组和对照组。在干预组中,每个医院和医生每月以适当的格式公开发布每张处方的平均支出,需要使用抗生素的处方的百分比以及需要注射抗生素的处方的百分比和值。在干预前后四个月收集数据。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于使医生特征中观察到的协变量(性别,年龄,经验,受教育程度,职称和月收入)差异最小化。 PSM后获得108对医生。卡方检验和t检验用于探讨药物信息公开报告对合理用药的影响。该研究得到华中科技大学同济医学院委员会的批准(IORG号:IORG0003571)。结果基线时,274名医生的平均每笔支出为42.82元人民币(6.97美元),需要抗生素的处方百分比为63.00%,需要注射的处方百分比为70.79%,均高于湖北省平均水平。省和世卫组织推荐的标准。干预之前,所有三个指标均具有可比性(p> 0.05),而干预之后,两者之间存在显着差异(p结论)在研究地区的乡镇医院,不合理用药仍然是一个政策问题。我们证明了公开报告用药信息可以减少中国乡镇医院需要注射的处方的百分比,但是在处方费用和抗生素使用上并未观察到这种影响,建议对公开使用药物信息的机制和长期影响进行分析,以进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号