...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Cancer treatment and the risk of cancer death among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal South Australians: analysis of a matched cohort study
【24h】

Cancer treatment and the risk of cancer death among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal South Australians: analysis of a matched cohort study

机译:南澳大利亚州原住民和非原住民的癌症治疗和癌症死亡风险:一项配对研究的分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians have poorer cancer outcomes than other Australians. Comparatively little is known of the type and amount of cancer treatment provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and the consequences for cancer survival. This study quantifies the influence of surgical, systemic and radiotherapy treatment on risk of cancer death among matched cohorts of cancer cases and, the comparative exposure of cohorts to these treatments. Cancers registered among Aboriginal South Australians in 1990–2010 (N?=?777) were matched with randomly selected non-Indigenous cases by sex, birth and diagnostic year, and primary site, then linked to administrative cancer treatment for the period from 2?months before to 13?months after diagnosis. Competing risk regression summarised associations of Indigenous status, geographic remoteness, comorbidities, cancer stage and treatment exposure with risk of cancer death. Fewer Aboriginal cases had localised disease at diagnosis (37.2% versus 50.2%) and they were less likely to: experience hospitalisation with cancer diagnosis, unadjusted odds ratio (UOR)?=?0.76; 95%CI?=?0.59–0.98; have surgery UOR?=?0.65; 95%CI?=?0.53–0.80; systemic therapies UOR?=?0.64; 95%CI?=?0.52–0.78; or radiotherapy, UOR?=?0.76; 95%CI?=?0.63–0.94. Localised disease carried lower risk of cancer death compared to advanced cases receiving surgery or systemic therapies, SHR?=?0.34; 95%CI?=?0.25–0.47 and SHR?=?0.35; 95%CI?=?0.25–0.48. Advanced disease and no treatment carried higher risk of cancer death, SHR?=?1.82; 95%CI?=?1.26–2.63. The effects of treatment did not differ between Aboriginal and non-Indigenous cohorts. However, comparatively less exposure to surgical and systemic treatments among Aboriginal cancer cases further complicated the disadvantages associated with geographic remoteness, advanced stage of disease and co-morbid conditions at diagnosis and add to disparities in cancer death. System level responses to improving access, utilisation and quality of effective treatments are needed to improve survival after cancer diagnosis.
机译:澳大利亚土著和托雷斯海峡岛民比其他澳大利亚人的癌症结局更差。对原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的癌症治疗的类型和数量及其对癌症生存的影响知之甚少。这项研究量化了手术,全身和放疗治疗对匹配的癌症病例队列中癌症死亡风险的影响,以及队列人群对这些治疗的比较暴露。将1990-2010年在南澳大利亚州原住民中注册的癌症(N?=?777)与按性别,出生年份和诊断年以及原发地点随机选择的非土著病例进行配对,然后与2个月以内的行政癌症治疗相关。诊断前几个月至诊断后13个月。竞争风险回归分析总结了土著地位,地理偏远性,合并症,癌症分期和治疗暴露与癌症死亡风险之间的关系。较少的原住民病例在诊断时具有局部疾病(37.2%对50.2%),并且他们不太可能:因癌症诊断而住院,未调整比值比(UOR)?= 0.76; 95%CI?=?0.59–0.98;手术UOR == 0.65; 95%CI?=?0.53-0.80;全身疗法UOR≥0.64; 95%CI?=?0.52-0.78;或放疗,UOR?=?0.76; 95%CI?=?0.63-0.94。与接受手术或全身治疗的晚期病例相比,局部疾病的癌症死亡风险更低,SHR≥0.34; 95%CI?=?0.25-0.47,SHR?=?0.35; 95%CI?=?0.25-0.48。晚期疾病和未进行治疗的癌症死亡风险更高,SHR≥1.82。 95%CI?=?1.26-2.63。在土著人群和非土著人群中,治疗效果没有差异。然而,在原住民癌症病例中,相对较少的手术和全身性治疗进一步使与地理偏远,疾病晚期和诊断时的合并症相关的弊端更加复杂,并增加了癌症死亡的差距。需要系统水平的响应来改善有效治疗的获取,利用和质量,以提高癌症诊断后的生存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号