...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Does implementation of a hospitalist program in a Canadian community hospital improve measures of quality of care and utilization? an observational comparative analysis of hospitalists vs. traditional care providers
【24h】

Does implementation of a hospitalist program in a Canadian community hospital improve measures of quality of care and utilization? an observational comparative analysis of hospitalists vs. traditional care providers

机译:在加拿大社区医院实施住院医生计划是否可以改善护理和利用质量的措施?对住院医生与传统护理提供者的观察性比较分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Despite the growth of hospitalist programs in Canada, little is known about their effectiveness for improving quality of care and use of scarce healthcare resources. The objective of this study is to compare measures of cost and quality of care (in-hospital mortality, 30-day same-facility readmission, and length of stay) of hospitalists vs. traditional physician providers in a large Canadian community hospital setting. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) Discharge Database, using multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses comparing performance of four provider groups of traditional family physicians (FPs), traditional internal medicine subspecialists (other-IM), family physician-trained hospitalists (FP-Hospitalist), and general internal medicine-trained hospitalists (GIM-Hospitalist). Results Compared to traditional FPs, FP-Hospitalists and GIM-Hospitalists demonstrate lower mortality [OR 0.881, (CI 0.779 – 0.996); and OR 0.355, (CI 0.288 – 0.436)] and readmission rates [OR 0.766, (CI 0.678 – 0.867); and OR 0.800, (CI 0.675 – 0.948)]. Compared to traditional FPs, GIM-Hospitalists appear to improve length of stay [OR?2.975, (CI ?3.302 – -2.647)] while FP-Hospitalists perform similarly [OR 0.096, (CI ?0.136 – 0.329)]. Compared to other-IM, GIM-Hospitalists have similar performance on all measures while FP-Hospitalists show a mixed impact. Conclusions Compared to traditional family physicians, hospitalists appear to improve measures of quality and resource utilization. Specifically, hospitalists demonstrate lower in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates while improving (or at least showing similar) length of stay. Compared to traditional subspecialists, hospitalists demonstrate similar performance despite looking after sicker and more complex medical patients.
机译:背景技术尽管加拿大的住院医生计划不断增长,但对于提高护理质量和使用稀缺医疗资源的有效性知之甚少。这项研究的目的是在加拿大一家大型社区医院环境中比较住院医生与传统医生提供者的费用和护理质量(院内死亡率,30天同设施再入院率和住院时间)的量度。方法我们对加拿大健康信息研究所(CIHI)出院数据库中的数据进行了回顾性分析,使用多元逻辑和线性回归分析比较了四个传统家庭医生(FPs),传统内科专科医师(other-IM ),家庭医生培训的住院医生(FP-Hospitalist)和普通内科医学培训的住院医生(GIM-Hospitalist)。结果与传统的FP相比,FP医院和GIM医院的死亡率更低[OR 0.881,(CI 0.779 – 0.996);和OR 0.355,(CI 0.288 – 0.436)]和再入院率[OR 0.766,(CI 0.678 – 0.867);和OR 0.800,(CI 0.675 – 0.948)]。与传统的FP相比,GIM医院的住院医师似乎可以改善住院时间[OR?2.975,(CI?3.302 – -2.647)],而FP医院的住院医生的住院时间也相似[OR 0.096,(CI?0.136 – 0.329)]。与其他IM相比,GIM医院在所有指标上的表现相似,而FP医院则表现出不同的影响。结论与传统的家庭医生相比,住院医生似乎在改善质量和资源利用方面。具体而言,住院医生表现出较低的住院死亡率和30天的再入院率,同时改善了(或至少表现出相似的)住院时间。与传统的亚专科医生相比,尽管照顾了病情较重和较复杂的内科病人,医院的表现仍然相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号