首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Types of health care facilities and the quality of primary care: a study of characteristics and experiences of Chinese patients in Guangdong Province, China
【24h】

Types of health care facilities and the quality of primary care: a study of characteristics and experiences of Chinese patients in Guangdong Province, China

机译:保健设施的类型和初级保健的质量:中国广东省中国患者的特征和经验研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In China, most people tend to use hospitals rather than health centers for their primary care generally due to the perception that quality of care provided in the hospital setting is superior to that provided at the health centers. No studies have been conducted in China to compare the quality of primary care provided at different health care settings. The purpose of this study is to compare the quality of primary care provided in different types of health care facilities in China. Methods A cross-sectional survey with patients was conducted in Guangdong province of China, using the validated Chinese Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT). ANOVA was performed to compare the overall and 10 domains of primary care quality for patients in tertiary, secondary, and primary health care settings. Multivariate analyses were used to assess the association between types of facility and quality of primary care attributes while controlling for sociodemographic and health care characteristics. Results The final number of respondents was 864 including 161 from county hospitals, 190 from rural community health centers (CHCs), 164 from tertiary hospitals, 80 from secondary hospitals, and 269 from urban CHCs. Type of health care facilities was significantly associated with total PCAT score and domain scores. CHC was associated with higher total PCAT score and scores for first contact-access, ongoing care, comprehensiveness-services available, and community orientation than secondary and/or tertiary hospitals, after controlling for patients’ demographic and health characteristics. Higher PCAT score was associated with greater satisfaction with primary care received. CHC patients were more likely to report satisfactory experiences compared to patients from secondary and tertiary facilities. Conclusions The study demonstrated that CHCs provided better quality primary care when compared with secondary and tertiary health care facilities, justifying CHCs as a model of primary care delivery.
机译:背景技术在中国,由于人们认为医院环境中提供的护理质量优于卫生中心,因此大多数人倾向于将医院而不是卫生中心用于初级保健。中国尚未进行任何研究来比较不同医疗机构提供的基本医疗服务的质量。本研究的目的是比较中国不同类型的医疗机构提供的初级保健的质量。方法使用经过验证的中国初级保健评估工具(PCAT)在中国广东省对患者进行横断面调查。进行方差分析以比较三级,二级和一级医疗机构患者的总体和十个领域的一级医疗质量。在控制社会人口统计学和医疗保健特征的同时,使用多变量分析评估设施类型与初级保健属性质量之间的关联。结果最终受访者为864名,其中县医院161名,农村社区卫生中心(CHC)190名,三级医院164名,二级医院80名,城市CHC 269名。卫生保健机构的类型与总PCAT分数和领域分数显着相关。在控制了患者的人口统计和健康特征之后,CHC与PCAT的总得分以及在初次接触,持续护理,可获得的全面服务和社区定位方面的得分相比,二级和/或三级医院更高。 PCAT分数越高,对接受初级保健的满意度越高。与来自二级和三级机构的患者相比,CHC患者更有可能报告满意的经历。结论该研究表明,与二级和三级卫生保健机构相比,社区卫生中心可提供质量更好的初级卫生保健,证明社区卫生中心是初级卫生保健提供服务的典范。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号