首页> 外文期刊>BMC Surgery >Comparing the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
【24h】

Comparing the short-term outcomes of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

机译:腹腔镜胃全胃切除术后体内食管空肠吻合术与体外食管空肠吻合术的近期疗效比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) using intracorporeal anastomosis has gradually developed due to advancements in laparoscopic surgical instruments. However, totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) with intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (IE) is still uncommon because of technical difficulties. Herein, we evaluated various types of IE after TLTG in terms of the technical aspects. We compared the short-term operative outcomes between TLTG with IE and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) with extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EE). Methods Between March 2006 and December 2014, a total of 213 patients with gastric cancer underwent TLTG and LATG. Overall, 92 patients underwent TLTG with IE, and 121 patients underwent LATG with EE. Generally, there are two methods of IE: mechanical staplers (circular or linear staplers) and hand-sewn sutures. Surgical efficiencies and outcomes were compared between two groups. We also described various types of IE using a subgroup analysis. Results The mean operation times were similar in the two groups, as was the number of retrieved lymph nodes. However, the mean estimated blood loss of TLTG was statistically lower than LATG. There were no significant differences in time to first flatus, the time to restart oral intake, the length of the hospital stay after operation, and postoperative complications. Four types of IE have been applied after TLTG, including 42 cases of hand-sewn IE. The overall mean operation time and the mean anastomotic time in TLTG were 279.5?±?38.4?min and 52.6?±?18.9?min respectively. There was no case of conversion to open procedure. Postoperative complication occurred in 16 patients (17.4?%) and no postoperative mortality occurred. Conclusions IE is a feasible procedure and can be safely performed for TLTG with the proper laparoscopic expertise. It is technically feasible to perform hand-sewn IE after TLTG, which can reduce the cost of the laparoscopic procedure.
机译:背景技术由于腹腔镜手术器械的发展,使用体内吻合术的全腹腔镜远端胃切除术(TLDG)已逐渐发展起来。然而,由于技术上的困难,全腹腔镜全胃切除术(TLTG)与体内食管空肠吻合术(IE)仍然不常见。在本文中,我们从技术方面评估了TLTG之后的各种类型的IE。我们比较了TLTG与IE和腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术(LATG)与体外食管空肠吻合术(EE)之间的短期手术效果。方法2006年3月至2014年12月,共213例胃癌患者接受了TLTG和LATG。总体而言,有92例患者接受IE的TLTG,有121例患者接受EE的LATG。通常,IE的方法有两种:机械订书机(圆形或线性订书机)和手工缝线。比较两组的手术效率和结果。我们还使用子组分析描述了各种类型的IE。结果两组的平均手术时间相似,取回的淋巴结数目也相似。但是,TLTG的平均估计失血量在统计学上低于LATG。首次肠胃胀气的时间,重新开始口服的时间,术后住院时间以及术后并发症均无显着差异。 TLTG之后应用了四种类型的IE,包括42例手工缝制的IE。 TLTG的总平均手术时间和平均吻合时间分别为279.5±38.4分钟和52.6±18.9分钟。没有发生转换为开放程序的情况。 16例患者发生术后并发症(17.4%),且无术后死亡率发生。结论IE是一种可行的方法,可以通过适当的腹腔镜专业知识对TLTG安全地进行。在TLTG之后进行手工缝制的IE在技术上是可行的,这可以降低腹腔镜手术的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号