...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Strength-balance supplemented with computerized cognitive training to improve dual task gait and divided attention in older adults: a multicenter randomized-controlled trial
【24h】

Strength-balance supplemented with computerized cognitive training to improve dual task gait and divided attention in older adults: a multicenter randomized-controlled trial

机译:力量平衡与计算机认知训练相辅相成,以改善老年人的双重任务步态和注意力分散:一项多中心随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Exercise interventions often do not combine physical and cognitive training. However, this combination is assumed to be more beneficial in improving walking and cognitive functioning compared to isolated cognitive or physical training. Methods A multicenter parallel randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare a motor to a cognitive-motor exercise program. A total of 182 eligible residents of homes-for-the-aged (n?=?159) or elderly living in the vicinity of the homes (n?=?23) were randomly assigned to either strength-balance (SB) or strength-balance-cognitive (SBC) training. Both groups conducted similar strength-balance training during 12?weeks. SBC additionally absolved computerized cognitive training. Outcomes were dual task costs of walking, physical performance, simple reaction time, executive functions, divided attention, fear of falling and fall rate. Participants were analysed with an intention to treat approach. Results The 182 participants (mean age?±?SD: 81.5?±?7.3?years) were allocated to either SB (n?=?98) or SBC (n?=?84). The attrition rate was 14.3%. Interaction effects were observed for dual task costs of step length (preferred walking speed: F(1,174)?=?4.94, p?=?0.028, η2?=?0.027, fast walking speed: F(1,166)?=?6.14, p?=?0.009, η2?=?0.040) and dual task costs of the standard deviation of step length (F(1,166)?=?6.14, p?=?0.014, η2?=?0.036), in favor of SBC. Significant interactions in favor of SBC revealed for in gait initiation (F(1,166)?=?9.16, p?=?0.003, η2?=?0.052), ‘reaction time’ (F(1,180)?=?5.243, p?=?0.023, η2?=?0.028) & ‘missed answers’ (F(1,180)?=?11.839, p?=?0.001, η2?=?0.062) as part of the test for divided attention. Within-group comparison revealed significant improvements in dual task costs of walking (preferred speed; velocity (p?=?0.002), step time (p?=?0.018), step length (p?=?0.028), fast speed; velocity (p?
机译:背景技术运动干预常常不能将身体训练和认知训练结合在一起。但是,与孤立的认知或体育锻炼相比,该组合被认为在改善步行和认知功能方面更为有益。方法进行了一项多中心平行随机对照试验,以比较运动与认知运动计划。总共182名符合条件的老年人住宅(n?=?159)或住在该房屋附近的老年人(n?=?23)被随机分配到强度平衡(SB)或强度平衡认知(SBC)训练。两组在12周内进行了类似的力量平衡训练。 SBC还免除了计算机化的认知训练。结果是步行,身体机能,简单的反应时间,执行功能,注意力分散,对跌倒和跌倒的恐惧等双重任务成本。参加者进行了分析,目的是治疗方法。结果182名参与者(平均年龄±SD:81.5±7.3岁)被分配到SB(n = 98)或SBC(n = 84)。损耗率为14.3%。对于步长的双重任务成本,观察到交互作用(首选步行速度:F(1,174)?=?4.94,p?=?0.028,η2?=?0.027,快速步行速度:F(1,166)?=?6.14, p?=?0.009,η2?=?0.040)和步长标准偏差的双重任务成本(F(1,166)?=?6.14,p?=?0.014,η2?=?0.036),有利于SBC 。在步态启动中显示出有利于SBC的显着相互作用(F(1,166)?=?9.16,p?=?0.003,η2?=?0.052),'反应时间'(F(1,180)?=?5.243,p? =?0.023,η2?=?0.028)和“遗漏答案”(F(1,180)?=?11.839,p?=?0.001,η2?=?0.062)作为分散注意力测试的一部分。组内比较显示行走的双重任务成本(首选速度;速度(p?=?0.002),步长时间(p?=?0.018),步长(p?=?0.028),快速速度;速度)显着改善。 (p <0.001),步长(p = 0.035),步长(p = 0.001),简单反应时间(p <0.001),执行功能(Trail制作测试B; p = 0.001)。 (<0.001),注意力分散(p <0.001),害怕跌倒(p <0.001)和跌倒率(p <0.001)。结论力量平衡训练与特定的认知训练相结合对步行,步态起始和注意力分散的双重任务成本具有积极的额外影响。这些发现进一步证实了先前的研究,表明力量平衡训练可改善执行功能并减少跌倒。试验注册该试验已根据ISRCTN75134517注册

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号