首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Feasibility and impact of a post–discharge geriatric evaluation and management service for patients from residential care: the Residential Care Intervention Program in the Elderly (RECIPE)
【24h】

Feasibility and impact of a post–discharge geriatric evaluation and management service for patients from residential care: the Residential Care Intervention Program in the Elderly (RECIPE)

机译:出院后老年护理评估和管理服务对住院护理患者的可行性和影响:老年人住院护理干预计划(RECIPE)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Geriatric evaluation and management has become standard care for community dwelling older adults following an acute admission to hospital. It is unclear whether this approach is beneficial for the frailest older adults living in permanent residential care. This study was undertaken to evaluate (1) the feasibility and consumer satisfaction with a geriatrician-led supported discharge service for older adults living in residential care facilities (RCF) and (2) its impact on the uptake of Advanced Care Planning (ACP) and acute health care service utilisation. Methods In 2002–4 a randomised controlled trial was conducted in Melbourne, Australia comparing the geriatrician–led outreach service to usual care for RCF residents. Patients were recruited during their acute hospital stay and followed up at the RCF for six months. The intervention group received a post-discharge home visit within 96 hours, at which a comprehensive geriatric assessment was performed and a care plan developed. Participants and their families were also offered further meetings to discuss ACPs and document Advanced Directives (AD). Additional reviews were made available for assessment and management of intercurrent illness within the RCF. Consumer satisfaction was surveyed using a postal questionnaire. Results The study included 116 participants (57 intervention and 59 controls) with comparable baseline characteristics. The service was well received by consumers demonstrated by higher satisfaction with care in the intervention group compared to controls (95% versus 58%, p?=?0.006). AD were completed by 67% of participants/proxy decision makers in the intervention group compared to 13% of RCF residents prior to service commencement. At six months there was a significant reduction in outpatient visits (intervention 21 (37%) versus controls 45 (76%), (p? Conclusion It is feasible to provide a supported discharge service that includes geriatrician assessment and care planning within a RCF. By expanding the service there is the potential for acute health care cost savings by decreasing the demand for outpatient consultation and further reducing acute care bed-days.
机译:背景老年病评估和管理已成为急性入院后社区居民老年人的标准护理。尚不清楚这种方法是否对生活在永久性居所护理中的最脆弱的老年人有益。进行这项研究的目的是评估(1)老年医生领导的针对居住在住宅护理设施(RCF)中的老年人提供支持的出院服务的可行性和消费者满意度,以及(2)它对采用高级护理计划(ACP)的影响以及急性医疗服务利用。方法2002–4年,在澳大利亚墨尔本进行了一项随机对照试验,将老年医生领导的外展服务与RCF居民的常规护理进行了比较。在急性住院期间招募患者,并在RCF随访六个月。干预组在出院后的96个小时内接受了家访,进行了全面的老年医学评估并制定了护理计划。还向参与者及其家人提供了进一步的会议,以讨论ACP并记录高级指令(AD)。提供了更多的评论,以评估和管理RCF中的并发疾病。使用邮政调查表对消费者满意度进行了调查。结果研究包括116名具有可比基线特征的参与者(57名干预者和59名对照)。与对照组相比,干预组对护理的满意度更高(95%对58%,p = 0.006),这表明消费者对服务的好评。干预组中67%的参与者/代理决策者完成了广告,而在服务开始之前,RCF居民中只有13%完成了广告。在六个月时,门诊就诊人数显着减少(干预21(37%),而对照组为45(76%)。(p结论)在RCF中提供包括老年医学评估和护理计划在内的支持出院服务是可行的。通过扩大服务范围,有可能通过减少对门诊的需求并进一步减少急诊就诊天数来节省急诊医疗费用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号