...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Gastroenterology >A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)
【24h】

A prospective, multi centre, randomized clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of Ertapenem 3 days versus Ampicillin - Sulbactam 3 days in the treatment of localized community acquired intra-abdominal infection. (T.E.A. Study: Three days Ertapenem vs three days Ampicillin-sulbactam)

机译:一项前瞻性,多中心,随机临床研究,比较了厄他培南3天和氨苄青霉素-舒巴坦3天在局部社区获得性腹腔内感染治疗中的疗效和安全性。 (T.E.A.研究:厄他培南3天vs氨苄西林舒巴坦3天)

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The recommendations outlined in the latest guidelines published by the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) regarding the proper duration of antibiotic therapy in patients with intra-abdominal infections are limited and non-specific. This ambiguity is due mainly to the lack of clinical trials on the topic of optimal duration of therapy. It is well known that the overuse of antibiotics has several important consequences such as increased treatment costs, reduced clinical efficacy, and above all, the increased emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Ampicillin-Sulbactam is a commonly used "first line" antibiotic for intra-abdominal infections. Ertapenem and Ampicillin-sulbactam are recommended as primary treatment agents for localized peritonitis by both the SIS and IDSA guidelines. Methods/Design This study is a prospective multi-center randomized investigation. The study will be performed in the Departments of General, Emergency, and Transplant Surgery of Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital in Bologna, Italy, in the General Surgery Department of the Ospedali Riuniti of Bergamo, Italy, and in the Trauma and Emergency Surgery Department of Maggiore Hospital in Bologna, Italy, and will be conducted by all surgeons willing to participate in the study. The inclusion period of the study will take approximately two years before the planned number of 142 enrolled patients is reached. Discussion Ertapenem and Ampicillin-sulbactam are recommended both as primary treatment agents for localized peritonitis by both the SIS and IDSA guidelines. As one of the discussed topic is the optimal duration of the antibiotic therapy and this ambiguity is due mainly to the lack of clinical trials on the topic, the present study aims for obtain precise data. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00630513
机译:背景技术由美国外科感染学会(SIS)和美国传染病学会(IDSA)发布的最新指南中概述的有关腹腔内感染患者适当的抗生素治疗持续时间的建议是有限的且非特异性的。这种歧义主要是由于缺乏有关最佳治疗持续时间的临床试验。众所周知,过度使用抗生素会产生一些重要的后果,例如治疗费用增加,临床疗效降低,最重要的是,抗生素耐药性病原体的出现增加。氨苄西林舒巴坦是用于腹腔内感染的常用“一线”抗生素。 SIS和IDSA指南均推荐厄他培南和氨苄西林舒巴坦作为局部性腹膜炎的主要治疗药物。方法/设计本研究是一项前瞻性多中心随机研究。该研究将在意大利博洛尼亚的Sant'Orsola-Malpighi大学医院的普通外科,急诊和移植外科,意大利贝加莫的Ospedali Riuniti普通外科,以及创伤和急诊外科中进行。意大利博洛尼亚的马焦雷医院科将由所有愿意参加研究的外科医生进行。该研究的纳入期大约需要两年时间,才能达到计划的142名登记患者的数量。讨论SIS和IDSA指南均推荐厄他培南和氨苄西林舒巴坦均作为局限性腹膜炎的主要治疗剂。由于讨论的主题之一是抗生素治疗的最佳持续时间,而这种歧义主要是由于缺乏有关该主题的临床试验,因此本研究旨在获得准确的数据。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00630513

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号