首页> 外文期刊>BMC Palliative Care >Cultural differences in spiritual care: findings of an Israeli oncologic questionnaire examining patient interest in spiritual care
【24h】

Cultural differences in spiritual care: findings of an Israeli oncologic questionnaire examining patient interest in spiritual care

机译:精神保健方面的文化差异:一份以色列肿瘤学调查表的调查结果,该问卷调查了患者对精神保健的兴趣

获取原文
           

摘要

Background As professional spiritual care (chaplaincy) is introduced to new cultures worldwide, it bears examining which elements of screening and care are universal and, for those elements showing cultural difference, to study them in each culture. No quantitative spiritual care patient study had previously been done in Israel. Our objectives were twofold: 1) to examine who wants spiritual care in Israel, including demographic and clinical variables, and to compare against other results worldwide to further develop universal screening protocols 2) to see what patients want from spiritual care specifically in the Israeli setting. Methods Self-administered patient questionnaire examining spirituality/religiosity, interest in spiritual care (subdivided by type of care), and key demographic, social, and clinical data. The study setting was an Israeli oncology center at which spiritual care had been recently introduced. Results Data from 364 oncology patient questionnaires found 41% interest in spiritual care, as compared to 35%-54% in American studies. Having previously been visited by a spiritual caregiver predicted patient interest in further spiritual care (AOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.6), suggesting that the new service is being well-received. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis identified additional predictors of openness to receiving spiritual care: self-describing as somewhat/very spiritual vs. not spiritual (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.9 and 6.3, 95% CI 1.8-8.6 and 2.6-15.1) or traditional/religious vs. secular (AOR 2.2 and 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.6 and 1.1-4.0); and receiving one visit a week or less from family and friends (AOR 5.6, 95% CI 2.1-15.1). These findings are in line with previous American studies, suggesting universality across cultures that could be utilized in screening. Differences in demographic data and medical condition were not significant predictors of patient interest, suggesting a cultural difference, where age and education were predictors in the American context. Levels of interest in explicitly religious or spiritual support such as prayer or addressing religious/spiritual questions were much lower than in other cultures. Conclusions Results illustrate the demand for and satisfaction with the new Israeli service. The cross-cultural comparison found both culture-dependent and possibly universal predictors of patient interest, and found lower interest in Israel for explicitly religious/spiritual types of support.
机译:背景技术随着专业精神关怀(牧业)被引入全球新文化中,它有待检验筛选和关怀的哪些要素是普遍的,对于那些表现出文化差异的要素,则需要在每种文化中进行研究。以色列以前没有进行过定量的精神保健患者研究。我们的目标是双重的:1)检查谁想要在以色列进行精神保健,包括人口统计和临床变量,并与全球其他结果进行比较,以进一步制定通用的筛查方案2)看看患者在以色列环境中特别需要精神保健。方法自我管理的患者问卷调查灵性/宗教信仰,对精神护理的兴趣(按护理类型细分)以及关键的人口统计,社会和临床数据。该研究机构是以色列一家肿瘤中心,最近在该中心引入了精神保健。结果从364份肿瘤学患者调查表中获得的数据发现,对精神保健的兴趣为41%,而在美国的研究中为35%-54%。先前曾由精神护理人员访问过的患者预测患者会对进一步的精神护理产生兴趣(AOR 2.4,95%CI 1.2-4.6),这表明新服务受到了广泛欢迎。多元逐步Logistic回归分析确定了接受精神保健的其他预测因素:自我描述为某种/非常灵性而非灵性(调整后的优势比[AOR] 3.9和6.3,95%CI 1.8-8.6和2.6-15.1)或传统/宗教与世俗(AOR 2.2和2.1,95%CI 1.3-3.6和1.1-4.0);并得到家人和朋友每周一次或更少的拜访(AOR 5.6,95%CI 2.1-15.1)。这些发现与以前的美国研究一致,表明可以用于筛选的跨文化的普遍性。人口统计学数据和医疗状况的差异并不是患者兴趣的重要预测指标,这表明在文化背景上,年龄和文化程度是美国情况下的预测指标。对明确的宗教或精神支持(如祈祷或解决宗教/精神问题)的兴趣水平远低于其他文化。结论结果表明了对新以色列服务的需求和满意度。跨文化比较发现患者对患者的兴趣取决于文化因素,也可能是普遍因素,并且对以色列的宗教/精神明确支持兴趣较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号