首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making >Comparison of alphabetical versus categorical display format for medication order entry in a simulated touch screen anesthesia information management system: an experiment in clinician-computer interaction in anesthesia
【24h】

Comparison of alphabetical versus categorical display format for medication order entry in a simulated touch screen anesthesia information management system: an experiment in clinician-computer interaction in anesthesia

机译:在模拟触摸屏麻醉信息管理系统中输入用药顺序的字母显示格式和分类显示格式的比较:麻醉中临床医生与计算机交互的实验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Anesthesia information management system (AIMS) records should be designed and configured to facilitate the accurate and prompt recording of multiple drugs administered coincidentally or in rapid succession. Methods We proposed two touch-screen display formats for use with our department’s new EPIC touch-screen AIMS. In one format, medication “buttons” were arranged in alphabetical order (i.e. A-C, D-H etc.). In the other, buttons were arranged in categories (Common, Fluids, Cardiovascular, Coagulation etc.). Both formats were modeled on an iPad screen to resemble the AIMS interface. Anesthesia residents, anesthesiologists, and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (n?=?60) were then asked to find and touch the correct buttons for a series of medications whose names were displayed to the side of the entry screen. The number of entries made within 2 minutes was recorded. This was done 3 times for each format, with the 1st format chosen randomly. Data were analyzed from the third trials with each format to minimize differences in learning. Results The categorical format had a mean of 5.6 more drugs entered using the categorical method in two minutes than the alphabetical format (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5 to 6.8, P? Conclusions The use of touch-screen user interfaces in healthcare is increasingly common. Arrangement of drugs names in a categorical display format in the medication order-entry touch screen of an AIMS can result in faster data entry compared to an alphabetical arrangement of drugs. Results of this quality improvement project were used in our department’s design of our final intraoperative electronic anesthesia record. This testing approach using cognitive and usability engineering methods can be used to objectively design and evaluate many aspects of the clinician-computer interaction in electronic health records.
机译:应设计和配置背景麻醉信息管理系统(AIMS)记录,以帮助准确而迅速地记录同时或快速连续给药的多种药物。方法我们提出了两种触摸屏显示格式,用于我们部门的新EPIC触摸屏AIMS。在一种格式中,药物“按钮”按字母顺序排列(即A-C,D-H等)。在其他按钮中,按类别(普通,液体,心血管,凝血等)进行了排列。两种格式都在iPad屏幕上建模,类似于AIMS界面。然后,要求麻醉师,麻醉师和注册护士麻醉师(n = 60)来找到并触摸一系列药品的正确按钮,这些药品的名称显示在输入屏幕的侧面。记录2分钟内的输入数量。每种格式进行3次,随机选择1 st 格式。对第三种试验的数据进行了分析,每种格式均使学习差异最小。结果分类格式在两分钟内平均使用分类方法输入的药物比字母格式多5.6(95%置信区间[CI]为4.5至6.8,P?)结论触摸屏用户界面在医疗保健中的使用越来越多与按字母顺序排列的药品相比,在AIMS的药品订单输入触摸屏中以分类显示格式排列药品名称可以更快地输入数据,此质量改进项目的结果用于我们部门的设计中最终术中电子麻醉记录这种使用认知和可用性工程方法的测试方法可用于客观设计和评估电子病历中临床医生与计算机交互作用的许多方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号