...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial
【24h】

Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial

机译:使用填充树脂复合材料进行常规治疗与无创修复治疗原发性和永久性牙列的效果:一项实用的随机临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Clinical studies are being conducted in less strict conditions in order to establish an adequate scientific basis for decision making. The aim of this pragmatic randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of single and multiple-surfaces restorations performed following the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) premises compared with Conventional Treatment (CT) using bulk fill composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth. Methods/design A total of 1,214 5-to-13?year-old children with at least one single or multiple-surface dentin caries lesion in primary or permanent molars will be selected in public schools of Barueri-SP, Brazil. The participants will be randomly assigned into 2 groups: CT (caries removal with bur and restoration performed with Scotchbond? Universal Adhesive system associated with Filtek Bulk Fill – 3?M/ESPE) and ART (Caries removal with hand instruments and restoration with high viscosity glass ionomer cement Ketac Molar Easy Mix – 3?M/ESPE). Ten untrained dentists will perform the treatment in in dental offices located at public schools. The restorations will be evaluated after 6, 12 and 24?months by an independent trained and calibrated examiner. The restoration and tooth survival, the cost-effectiveness analysis between the two groups and the operators’ preferences regarding the techniques will be also evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test will be applied for the restoration and tooth survival. All the average event rates in the two groups will be modelled and compared with a Cox proportional hazard shared frailty model since there is an operator-cluster effect. The significance level for all analyses will be 5?%. Discussion Our hypothesis is that despite similar expected effectiveness between ART using high viscosity GIC and conventional treatment using bulk fill composite resin when treating single or multiple-surface in posterior primary and permanent teeth, ART will present superior cost-effectiveness. The results of this trial will support decision-making by clinicians and policy makers. Trial registration NCT02568917 . Registered on May 10th 2015.
机译:背景技术正在较不严格的条件下进行临床研究,以便为决策制定提供足够的科学依据。这项实用的随机临床试验的目的是评估在无创修复治疗(ART)房舍与传统治疗(CT)进行的单次和多表面修复的有效性,而传统治疗(CT)使用的是在乳牙和恒牙中使用大块填充复合材料修复。方法/设计在巴西Barueri-SP的公立学校中,将选择总共1,214名5至13岁的儿童,其初级或永久性磨牙中至少有一个单表面或多表面牙本质龋病。参与者将被随机分为2组:CT(用Bur去除龋齿,并用Scotchbond?Filtek大容量填充胶与3?M / ESPE相关的通用胶粘剂进行修复)和ART(用手动仪器进行龋齿去除和高粘度修复)玻璃离聚物水泥Ketac Molar Easy Mix – 3?M / ESPE)。十名未经训练的牙医将在位于公立学校的牙科诊所进行治疗。在6、12和24个月后,将由一名经过培训和校准的独立检查员对修复物进行评估。还将评估修复和牙齿的存活情况,两组之间的成本效益分析以及操作者对技术的偏好。 Kaplan-Meier生存分析和对数秩检验将用于修复和牙齿生存。由于存在操作者群集效应,因此将对两组中所有事件的平均发生率进行建模,并与Cox比例风险共享脆弱性模型进行比较。所有分析的显着性水平将为5%。讨论我们的假设是,尽管在治疗后乳和恒牙的单面或多面时,使用高粘度GIC的抗逆转录病毒疗法和使用块状填充复合树脂的常规疗法具有相似的预期效果,但抗逆转录病毒疗法仍将具有出色的成本效益。该试验的结果将支持临床医生和政策制定者的决策。试用注册NCT02568917。 2015年5月10日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号