首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Ethics >New frontiers in the future of palliative care: real-world bioethical dilemmas and axiology of clinical practice
【24h】

New frontiers in the future of palliative care: real-world bioethical dilemmas and axiology of clinical practice

机译:姑息治疗未来的新领域:现实生活中的生物伦理困境和临床实践的价值论

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In our time there is growing interest in developing a systematic approach to oncologic patients and end-of-life care. An important goal within this domain is to identify the values and ethical norms that guide physicians’ decisions and their recourse to technological aids to preserve life. Though crucial, this objective is not easy to achieve. The purpose of this study is to evaluate empirically the real-life bioethical dilemmas with which palliative physicians are confronted when treating terminal cancer patients. Methods A quasi-experimental, observational, comparative, prospective and mixed (qualitative and quantitative) study was conducted in order to analyse the correlation between the palliative doctor-patient relationship and ethical judgments regarding everyday bioethical dilemmas that arise in palliative clinical practice. The values at stake in decision-making on a daily basis were also explored. From February 2012 to march 2014, palliative healthcare personnel were invited to participate in a research project on axiology of clinical practice in palliative medicine. Each participant answered to a set of survey instruments focusing on ethical dilemmas, views, and representations of clinical practice. For this analysis we selected a convenience sample of 30 physicians specialized in pain medicine and palliative care (algologists and palliativists), with two or more years of experience with oncologic patients and end-of-life care. Results 113 dilemmas were obtained, the most frequent of which were those regarding sedation, home administration of opioids, and institutional regulations. We observed that the ethical nucleus of palliative medicine is truth-telling, implying bidirectional trust between patients and healthcare providers. The two most prominent virtues among the participants in our study were justice and professional humility. The outstanding roles of the physician in palliative medicine are as educator and as adviser, followed by that of provider of medical assistance. Conclusions This investigation opens up new horizons in a career path where professional wearing is rampant. The rediscovery of values and virtues in palliative clinical practice will renew and replenish the motivation of healthcare providers who carry out these duties, giving them a new professional and personal perspective of growth.
机译:背景技术在我们这个时代,越来越有兴趣开发针对肿瘤患者和临终关怀的系统方法。该领域的一个重要目标是确定指导医师的决策及其使用技术手段来挽救生命的价值观和道德规范。尽管至关重要,但这个目标并不容易实现。这项研究的目的是从经验上评估姑息医师在治疗晚期癌症患者时所面临的现实生物伦理困境。方法进行准实验性,观察性,比较性,前瞻性和混合性(定性和定量)研究,以分析姑息性医患关系与姑息性临床实践中出现的日常生物伦理困境的伦理判断之间的相关性。还探讨了日常决策中的价值。从2012年2月到2014年3月,姑息保健人员应邀参加了有关姑息医学临床实践价值论的研究项目。每位参与者回答了一系列针对道德困境,观点和临床实践表征的调查工具。在本次分析中,我们选择了30名专门研究疼痛医学和姑息治疗的医师(水产学家和姑息治疗师)的便利样本,这些医师具有两年以上的肿瘤患者和临终护理经验。结果获得了113个难题,其中最常见的难题涉及镇静,阿片类药物的家庭管理和机构规定。我们观察到姑息医学的伦理核心是讲真话的,这意味着患者与医疗保健提供者之间的双向信任。在我们研究的参与者中,两个最突出的美德是正义和谦虚。在姑息医学中,医生的杰出作用是作为教育者和顾问,其次是医疗援助提供者。结论这项调查为职业配戴猖ramp的职业道路开辟了新视野。在姑息性临床实践中价值和美德的重新发现将更新并补充执行这些职责的医疗保健提供者的动力,从而为他们提供新的专业和个人发展视角。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号