首页> 外文期刊>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >Effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture for poststroke patients with shoulder pain: study protocol for a double-center, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, sham-controlled, parallel, clinical trial
【24h】

Effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture for poststroke patients with shoulder pain: study protocol for a double-center, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, sham-controlled, parallel, clinical trial

机译:电针治疗卒中后肩痛患者的有效性和安全性:一项双中心,随机,患者和评估者双盲,假对照,平行,临床试验的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Practitioners of complementary and alternative medicine have suggested that acupuncture could alleviate poststroke shoulder pain, based on the clinical evidence. This study protocol is aimed at showing the effectiveness and safety of electroacupuncture therapy for stroke survivors with shoulder pain. After assessing their eligibility, 60 stroke survivors with shoulder pain will be enrolled from two traditional Korean medicine hospitals and randomly divided into either the verum or the sham electroacupuncture (EA) group with a 1:1 ratio. The participants will receive 9 sessions of EA procedures for 3?weeks. The verum EA consists of needling on 6 unilateral acupoints (LI4, LI15, TE14, SI9, SI11, and GB21) with electronic stimulation. A non-penetrating Park sham device and fake electronic stimulation will be used in the sham group on the same acupoints. Patients and outcome assessors will be blinded throughout the entire study. A visual analog scale will be used primarily for the evaluation, and pain rating scale, Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity, modified Ashworth scale, manual muscle test, passive range of motion test, Korean version of a modified Barthel index, and Korean version of the Beck depression inventory will be also be measured. A blinding index will be assessed. For safety, adverse events will be recorded. Data will be statistically analyzed by two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for efficacy and a chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test for safety, at 5% of significance level. We expect this double-center, randomized, sham-controlled, patient- and assessor-blinded parallel trial to explore the effectiveness and safety of EA therapy, compared with sham EA, for poststroke shoulder pain.
机译:补充和替代医学的医生已经建议,根据临床证据,针灸可以缓解中风后肩痛。该研究方案旨在显示电针疗法对肩痛的中风幸存者的有效性和安全性。在评估他们的资格后,将从两家韩国传统医院中招募60名肩痛的中风幸存者,并按1:1比例将其随机分为普通或假电针(EA)组。参与者将接受为期3周的9堂EA程序。普通EA包括针刺6个单侧穴位(LI4,LI15,TE14,SI9,SI11和GB21),并进行电子刺激。假手术组将在相同的穴位上使用非穿透性的Park假手术设备和假电子刺激。在整个研究过程中,患者和结果评估者将不知情。视觉模拟量表将主要用于评估和疼痛量表,上肢的Fugl-Meyer评估,改良的Ashworth量表,手动肌肉测试,被动运动范围测试,韩文版的Barthel指数修订版和韩文版贝克抑郁量的清单也将被测量。将评估致盲指数。为了安全起见,将记录不良事件。数据将通过两个样本的t检验或Wilcoxon秩和检验进行统计学分析,以评估功效,并通过卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行安全性检验(显着性水平为5%)。我们希望这项双中心,随机,假对照,患者和评估者盲目的平行试验能够探索与假EA相比,EA治疗中风后肩痛的有效性和安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号