...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine >The interface with naturopathy in rural primary health care: a survey of referral practices of general practitioners in rural and regional New South Wales, Australia
【24h】

The interface with naturopathy in rural primary health care: a survey of referral practices of general practitioners in rural and regional New South Wales, Australia

机译:农村初级卫生保健中自然疗法的介入:澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村和地区全科医生转诊实践的调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Naturopathy forms an increasingly significant part of the Australian healthcare setting, with high utilisation of naturopaths by the Australian public and a large therapeutic footprint in rural and regional Australia. However, despite these circumstances, there has been little exploration of the interface between naturopathy providers and conventional primary health care practitioners in rural and regional Australia. The study reported here examined the referral practices and factors that underlie referral to naturopaths amongst a sample of rural and regional Australian general practitioners (GPs). Methods A 27-item questionnaire was sent to all 1,486 GPs currently practising in rural and regional Divisions of General Practice in New South Wales, Australia. Results A total of 585 GPs responded to the questionnaire, with 49 questionnaires returned as "no longer at this address" (response rate: 40.7%). One-quarter of GPs (25.8%) referred to a naturopath at least a few times per year while nearly half (48.8%) stated that they would not refer to a naturopath under any circumstances. GPs were more likely to refer to a naturopath if the GP: was not initially from a rural area (OR=1.78; 95% CI: 0.95, 3.33); believes in the efficacy of naturopathy (OR=5.62; 95% CI: 2.42, 11.36); has seen positive results from naturopathy previously (OR=2.61; 95% CI: 1.35, 5.05); perceives a lack of other treatment options for their patient (OR=5.25; 95% CI: 2.42; 11.36); uses peer-reviewed literature as their major source of CAM information (OR=3.03; 95% CI: 1.65, 5.55); uses CAM practitioners as a major source of CAM information (OR=6.09; 95% CI: 2.91, 12.72); and does not have an existing relationship with any CAM provider (OR=3.03; 95% CI: 1.53, 6.25). Conclusions There is little interaction (both via referrals as well as the development of professional relationships) between the naturopathic and GP communities in rural and regional Australia, with significant levels of both support and opposition for naturopathic referral amongst GPs. The significant presence and high utilisation of naturopathy in rural primary health care, which appears to work in parallel to conventional medical care rather than in conjunction with it, should serve as an impetus for increased research into naturopathy practice, policy and regulation in rural and regional health.
机译:背景技术自然疗法在澳大利亚医疗保健环境中的地位日益重要,澳大利亚公众对自然疗法的利用率很高,并且在澳大利亚的农村和地区拥有大量的治疗足迹。然而,尽管有这些情况,但在澳大利亚农村和地区,自然疗法提供者与传统的初级卫生保健从业者之间的关系却鲜有探索。此处报道的研究检查了澳大利亚乡村和地区全科医生(GPs)样本中转诊自然疗法的转诊实践和因素。方法向澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村和地区普通实践部门目前正在实践的所有1,486名普通科医生发送了27项问卷。结果共有585名GP回答了问卷,其中49份问卷以“不再在此地址”的形式返回(答复率为40.7%)。四分之一的全科医生(25.8%)每年至少提及几次自然疗法,而近一半(48.8%)表示在任何情况下都不会提及自然疗法。如果GP:最初不是来自农村地区(OR = 1.78; 95%CI:0.95,3.33); GP更倾向于指自然疗法。相信自然疗法的疗效(OR = 5.62; 95%CI:2.42,11.36);先前已从自然疗法中看到阳性结果(OR = 2.61; 95%CI:1.35,5.05);认为患者缺乏其他治疗选择(OR = 5.25; 95%CI:2.42; 11.36);使用经过同行评审的文献作为CAM信息的主要来源(OR = 3.03; 95%CI:1.65、5.55);使用CAM从业人员作为CAM信息的主要来源(OR = 6.09; 95%CI:2.91,12.72);并且与任何CAM供应商都没有关系(OR = 3.03; 95%CI:1.53,6.25)。结论澳大利亚乡村和地区的自然疗法和GP社区之间很少有互动(包括通过推荐以及专业关系的发展),GP之间的自然疗法推荐和支持都很高。农村初级卫生保健中大量存在和高度利用自然疗法,这似乎与常规医疗服务并行而不是与之相结合,应成为推动对农村和地区自然疗法实践,政策和法规进行更多研究的动力健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号