...
首页> 外文期刊>Biomedical Journal >A comparison between the effects of propofol–fentanyl with propofol–ketamine for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outside the operating room
【24h】

A comparison between the effects of propofol–fentanyl with propofol–ketamine for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outside the operating room

机译:异丙酚-芬太尼与丙泊酚-氯胺酮在手术室外进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术患者镇静作用的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The efficient and secure techniques of anesthesia and sedation have always been needed for. One of these procedures is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), due to its painfulness and long duration, has high sensitivity. We compare the effects of propofol–fentanyl (PF) with propofol–ketamine (PK) to sedate patients undergoing ERCP. Methods In this clinical trial, patients were divided into two groups of 49 people. A group?received a pharmaceutical combination of PK, and another group received a pharmaceutical combination of PF. Vital signs of patients, Ramsey Sedation Score, and pain of patients were assessed. The total dosage of used propofol was also recorded. Results There was no significant difference seen in the patients' hemodynamic characteristics in both groups. Pain at the end of surgery and an hour after it in the {PK} group was less that was?not statistically significant. By Ramsey Sedation Score also significant differences were not seen between groups (p?=?0.68). By using total dose of propofol used also a significant difference?was not observed between the two groups (p?=?0.36). Rate of apnea in {PK} group was 32% and in the {PF} group was 63%, which this difference was statistically significant (p?
机译:背景技术一直需要有效且安全的麻醉和镇静技术。这些手术之一是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP),由于其痛苦和持续时间长,具有很高的敏感性。我们比较了丙泊酚-芬太尼(PF)和丙泊酚-氯胺酮(PK)对接受ERCP的患者的影响。方法在该临床试验中,将患者分为两组,每组49人。一组接受PK的药物组合,另一组接受PF的药物组合。评估患者的生命体征,Ramsey镇静评分和患者的疼痛。还记录了所用丙泊酚的总剂量。结果两组患者的血流动力学特征无明显差异。 {PK}组在手术结束时和术后一个小时的疼痛较小,没有统计学意义。通过Ramsey镇静评分,各组之间也未发现显着差异(p = 0.68)。通过使用丙泊酚的总剂量,在两组之间也没有观察到显着的差异(p≤0.36)。 {PK}组的呼吸暂停发生率为32%,{PF}组的呼吸暂停发生率为63%,这一差异具有统计学意义(p <0.05)。结论两种药物组合的比较显示,尽管两组的血液动力学和镇静标准相似,但由于{PK}组的疼痛和呼吸暂停程度较低,因此该组合通常可以在{ERCP}程序中使用更高效,更安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号