...
首页> 外文期刊>Desalination and water treatment >Evaluation on membrane fouling by hydrophobic and hydrophilic substances through permeation coefficient and concentration polarization factor in SWRO processes
【24h】

Evaluation on membrane fouling by hydrophobic and hydrophilic substances through permeation coefficient and concentration polarization factor in SWRO processes

机译:通过SWRO工艺中的渗透系数和浓度极化系数评估疏水性和亲水性物质对膜的污染

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It is difficult to evaluate fouling of high-pressure membranes such as seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) membranes, although the fouling of low-pressure membranes such as microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes can be evaluated by monitoring the decrease in flux or the increase in trans-membrane pressure (TMP). In particular, it is more difficult to evaluate membrane fouling of SWRO membrane in actually plant because SWRO membranes are connected in series of six to eight elements in one vessel and fouling and concentration polarization occur at the same time. This study aimed to distinguish concentration polarization from membrane fouling by calculating the permeation coefficient and concentration polarization factor with the progression of membrane fouling. As fouling was progressed by organic matters, the permeation coefficient and concentration polarization factor decreased. Fouling layers by organic matters reduce the concentration polarization factor because fouling layers reduce the permeation coefficient by increasing the filtration resistance and cause cake reduced concentration polarization (CRCP) by interrupting the convection of salt. Furthermore, membranes with forward osmotic backwashing (FOB) are effective in controlling membrane fouling because FOB alleviate the decreasing rate of the permeation coefficient and concentration polarization factor compared to membranes without FOB. Therefore, it was possible to evaluate the degree of membrane fouling in SWRO membranes by analyzing changes in the permeation coefficient and concentration polarization factor with the progression of membrane fouling and to evaluate cleaning efficiency by comparing them before and after FOB. This made it possible to use permeation coefficient and concentration polarization factor as an indicator to determine the timing of cleaning-in-place (CIP) or physical cleaning such as FOB.
机译:尽管可以通过监测通量的减少来评估低压膜(例如微滤(MF)和超滤(UF))膜的结垢,但是很难评估诸如海水反渗透(SWRO)膜等高压膜的结垢。或跨膜压(TMP)升高。特别是,在实际工厂中评估SWRO膜的膜结垢更加困难,因为SWRO膜在一个容器中以六到八个元素串联连接,并且结垢和浓度极化同时发生。这项研究旨在通过计算渗透系数和浓度极化系数随膜污染的进展来区分膜极化的浓度极化。随着有机物结垢的进行,渗透系数和浓度极化系数降低。有机物造成的污染层降低了浓度极化系数,因为污染层通过增加过滤阻力降低了渗透系数,并通过中断盐的对流而导致滤饼降低了浓度极化(CRCP)。此外,与没有FOB的膜相比,具有正向渗透反洗(FOB)的膜可有效控制膜结垢,因为FOB可减轻渗透系数和浓度极化因子的降低速率。因此,有可能通过分析渗透系数和浓度极化因子随膜污染进程的变化来评估SWRO膜中的膜污染程度,并通过比较它们在FOB之前和之后的清洁效率来进行评估。这使得可以使用渗透系数和浓度极化系数作为指标来确定就地清洗(CIP)或物理清洗(如FOB)的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号