首页> 外文期刊>Desalination and water treatment >Adsorptive removal of diuron on biomass ashes: a comparative study using rice husk ash and bagasse fly ash as adsorbents
【24h】

Adsorptive removal of diuron on biomass ashes: a comparative study using rice husk ash and bagasse fly ash as adsorbents

机译:敌草隆对生物质灰分的吸附去除:以稻壳灰和甘蔗渣粉煤灰为吸附剂的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study describes the use of two types of biomass ashes (BMAs) as adsorbents for diuron removal. Two BMAs, namely rice husk ash (RHA) and bagasse fly ash (BFA), were used in this study, and their adsorption behavior and adsorption mechanism were compared based on various characteristics, such as surface area, pore diameter, and volume. It was found that the particle size and the composition of these BMAs, especially the content of carbon and silica, primarily affect the adsorption kinetics and capacity. Compared with RHA, BFA has more carbon content (47.37%), and therefore shows higher adsorption capacity (43.48mol/g). In addition, BFA has larger external surface area and exhibited faster kinetics at the initial adsorption stage; by contrast, RHA due to its larger pore diameter allows for faster pore adsorption and surpasses the initial kinetic rate of BFA. For the same particle size (0.354-0.251mm), the equilibrium capacity of BFA was found to be four times greater than that of RHA; in addition, the surface area of BFA is two times more than that of RHA, suggesting that BFA has more active sites than RHA. It was found that solution pH influences adsorption mechanism of diuron molecule on BMA. The uptake capacity of BFA and RHA is 10 times greater than natural adsorbents such as soil and is comparable with synthetic adsorbents such as activated carbon and multiwalled carbon nanotubes. To our knowledge, removal of diuron using ashes has not been reported previously.
机译:这项研究描述了使用两种类型的生物质灰(BMA)作为吸附剂来去除杜隆。本研究使用了两种稻谷灰(RHA)和甘蔗渣粉煤灰(BFA),并根据表面积,孔径和体积等各种特征比较了它们的吸附行为和吸附机理。发现这些BMA的粒度和组成,特别是碳和二氧化硅的含量,主要影响吸附动力学和容量。与RHA相比,BFA的碳含量更高(47.37%),因此显示出更高的吸附容量(43.48mol / g)。另外,BFA具有更大的外表面积,并且在初始吸附阶段表现出更快的动力学。相反,RHA由于其较大的孔径而具有更快的孔吸附能力,并超过了BFA的初始动力学速率。对于相同的粒径(0.354-0.251mm),发现BFA的平衡容量是RHA的四倍。此外,BFA的表面积是RHA的两倍,这表明BFA具有比RHA更多的活性位点。研究发现溶液的pH值影响敌草隆分子在BMA上的吸附机理。 BFA和RHA的吸收能力是土壤等天然吸附剂的10倍,可与活性炭和多壁碳纳米管等合成吸附剂相媲美。据我们所知,以前没有用灰烬除去敌草隆的报道。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号