首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Micro-tensile bond strength to surface and subsurface enamel
【24h】

Micro-tensile bond strength to surface and subsurface enamel

机译:对表面和表面搪瓷的微拉伸粘合强度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Testing of bond strength to enamel has been undertaken on both surface and subsurface enamel on the assumption that it is the same substrate. Over recent years, the micro-tensile method has become widely used for the evaluation of dental adhesives. However, there have been no micro-tensile bond strength studies comparing surface and subsurface enamel using orthodontic adhesives. It has been proposed that the bond strength to subsurface enamel is greater than that to surface enamel. Objective. The micro-tensile bond strength (MTBS) of Transbond (light activated paste, 3 M Unitek, USA) to surface and subsurface enamel was investigated. Methods. Ten sound freshly extracted lower human first molars were divided into two groups of five each. Surface enamel of the first group was removed with 500-grit silicone carbide paper, whilst in the second group it was left intact. Gelatin capsules filled with Transbond composite paste were bonded perpendicular to the enamel using light cure adhesive Primer (Transbond™ XT, 3 M Unitek, USA) in both groups, and stored in distilled water at 37 ℃ for 24 h. Crowns of all specimens were sectioned bucco-lingually into vertical slabs of approximately 0.6 mm thickness. Slabs in each group were prepared into an hourglass shape of 1mm width and 0.6 mm thickness. Micro-tensile bond strength was determined using a mini tensile testing machine (COMPACT Gauge, DILLON). Results. Mean values of MTBS were: 31.2 MPa (SD14.5) for surface enamel and 47.9 (SD15.0) for subsurface enamel. Significance. There was a significant difference between the two groups P = 0.001. It was concluded that subsurface enamel has significantly higher bond strength than surface enamel. This has implications for bonding in restorative dentistry and orthodontics.
机译:在表面和次表面搪瓷均是同一基材的前提下,已对表面搪瓷的粘合强度进行了测试。近年来,微拉伸法已被广泛用于牙科粘合剂的评估。但是,还没有微拉伸粘合强度研究比较使用正畸粘合剂的表面和亚表面搪瓷。已经提出,与表面搪瓷的结合强度大于与表面搪瓷的结合强度。目的。研究了Transbond(光活化浆料,美国3 M Unitek)与表面和亚表面搪瓷的微拉伸粘合强度(MTBS)。方法。将十个新鲜提取的下部人类第一磨牙分为两组,每组五个。第一组的表面搪瓷用500粒度的碳化硅纸去除,而第二组的表面搪瓷则完好无损。两组均使用光固化粘合剂Primer(Transbond™XT,3 M Unitek,美国)将填充有Transbond复合糊剂的明胶胶囊垂直于牙釉质粘合,并在37℃的蒸馏水中保存24小时。将所有标本的冠舌舌颊切成约0.6毫米厚的垂直平板。将每组中的板制备成1mm宽和0.6mm厚的沙漏形状。使用微型拉伸试验机(COMPACT Gauge,DILLON)测定微拉伸粘合强度。结果。 MTBS的平均值为:表面瓷漆为31.2 MPa(SD14.5),次表面瓷漆为47.9(SD15.0)。意义。两组之间存在显着差异,P = 0.001。结论是,表面搪瓷的粘合强度明显高于表面搪瓷。这对修复牙齿和牙齿矫正中的粘接有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号