首页> 外文期刊>Dental materials >Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns
【24h】

Strength and fracture pattern of monolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns

机译:整体CAD / CAM生成的后冠的强度和断裂模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives. This study evaluated the strength and fracture pattern of monolithic posterior CAD/CAM crowns hypothesizing that zinc-phosphate cemented lithium disilicate crowns might show the same fracture strength as adhesively cemented crowns. Methods. Two sets of monolithic posterior crowns each with uniform occlusal and lateral wall thickness of 1.5 mm were fabricated from three types of block ceramic (1) lithium disilicate glass, (2) leucite glass and (3)feldspathic ceramic using CEREC 3 CAD/CAM. Crowns (n=15) of ceramics (1), (2) and (3) each were (A) zinc-phosphate cemented, (B) adhesively cemented on resin-based composite dies and loaded until fracture. Load data was analyzed using ANOVA and Scheffe tests. Crack pattern was evaluated on an additional three sample cross-sections for each group at start of fracture. Results. Radial cracks originated early at the cementation interfaces and cone cracks were observed finally at the loading sites. Mean load values (SD) of A-crowns at fracture start/end (1) 807 (91) N/2082 (192) N; (2) 915 (193) N/1130 (166) N; (3) 985 (199) N/1270 (301) N were all significantly (P < 0.001) lower when compared to their B-crown analogs (1) 1456 (205) N/2389 (84) N; (2) 1684 (395) N/2469 (171) N; (3) 1548 (304) N/2392 (75) N, rejecting the authors hypothesis. A-1 crowns had significantly (P < 0.001) higher fracture load than A-2 and A-3 crowns. The A-1 crown fracture load data, even if significantly (P<0.001) lower, came close to the B-1 values. Significance. Adhesive cementation balanced the strength of weak ceramics with that of strong ceramic and recommended itself for leucite glass ceramic and feldspathic ceramic crowns. Zinc-phosphate cementation appeared feasible for lithium disilicate crowns.
机译:目标。这项研究评估了整体式后冠CAD / CAM冠的强度和断裂模式,并假设磷酸锌粘结的二硅酸锂冠可能显示出与粘结冠相同的断裂强度。方法。使用CEREC 3 CAD / CAM,由三种类型的块状陶瓷(1)二硅酸锂玻璃,(2)白云石玻璃和(3)长石形陶瓷制成两组均具有一致的咬合和侧壁厚度1.5毫米的整体后冠。陶瓷(1),(2)和(3)的牙冠(n = 15)分别是(A)磷酸锌胶粘剂,(B)胶粘剂胶粘在树脂基复合材料模具上并加载直至断裂。使用ANOVA和Scheffe测试分析负荷数据。在断裂开始时,对每组的另外三个样品横截面评估裂缝模式。结果。径向裂纹起源于胶结界面,最后在加载部位观察到锥形裂纹。断裂开始/结束时A冠的平均载荷值(SD)(1)807(91)N / 2082(192)N; (2)915(193)N / 1130(166)N; (3)985(199)N / 1270(301)N均显着低于(B)冠状类似物(P <0.001)(1)1456(205)N / 2389(84)N; (2)1684(395)N / 2469(171)N; (3)1548(304)N / 2392(75)N,拒绝了作者的假设。与A-2和A-3牙冠相比,A-1牙冠的骨折负荷明显更高(P <0.001)。即使A-1冠断裂载荷数据显着降低(P <0.001),也接近B-1值。意义。胶合胶结使弱陶瓷与强陶瓷的强度达到平衡,并推荐用于白云石玻璃陶瓷和长石陶瓷冠。磷酸锌胶结似乎可用于二硅酸锂冠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号