首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >EU assistance for civil society in Kosovo: a step too far for democracy promotion?
【24h】

EU assistance for civil society in Kosovo: a step too far for democracy promotion?

机译:欧盟对科索沃民间社会的援助:为促进民主迈出的一步吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

EU assistance for Kosovo is the most ambitious external relations venture embarked upon by the Commission to date. Not surprisingly, much of the aid is framed in terms of ‘civil society’ and channelled through a handful of local non-governmental organizations (NGOs). But attempts by foreign donors to promote civil society exogenously across post-socialist Eurasia are deemed to have achieved little in terms of stimulating individual participation and civic engagement. In response the EU appears to have refined its approach by combining the usual support for larger NGOs with more basic assistance for grassroots networks and community-based initiatives. Whilst such a twin-track strategy is arguably appropriate in the context of Kosovo where civil society participation is particularly low, in terms of maximizing the critical development of transactional capacity the approach may fail to target resources most effectively. It is argued here that there is a danger that normative concerns about liberal pluralism, enriching civil society and ensuring that assistance is widely dispersed may ultimately detract from the imperative of deploying limited resources first and foremost to secure a core of sustainable NGOs with developed capacity to engage government, the international community and other non-state actors in the process of policy reform. Indeed, drawing on the experience of civil society assistance in new member states of Central and Eastern Europe, it would seem that although NGOs are often criticized for their detachment from community organizations and campaigns, they perform a critical ‘behind the scenes’ role in policy change and state transformation. They can, if donor funding is appropriately targeted, facilitate the emergence of civil society networks through which small community organizations are then linked with larger, established and capacity-endowed organizations.View full textDownload full textKeywordsKosovo, EU, civil society, democracy promotionRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.563119
机译:欧盟对科索沃的援助是委员会迄今为止开展的最雄心勃勃的对外关系事业。毫不奇怪,许多援助都是根据“公民社会”来制定的,并通过少数地方非政府组织提供。但是,在刺激个人参与和公民参与方面,外国捐助者试图在后社会主义欧亚大陆外源性地促进公民社会的努力被认为收效甚微。作为回应,欧盟似乎通过将对大型非政府组织的通常支持与对基层网络和基于社区的倡议的更多基本援助相结合来完善其方法。尽管在公民社会参与度特别低的科索沃背景下,这样的双轨战略无疑是适当的,但就最大限度地提高交易能力的关键发展而言,这种方法可能无法最有效地瞄准资源。这里有论点认为,对自由多元主义的规范性关注,丰富的民间社会以及确保援助广泛散布的规范性关注最终有可能损害首先必须部署有限资源以确保具有发展能力的可持续性非政府组织的核心的危险。让政府,国际社会和其他非国家行为者参与政策改革。确实,借鉴中欧和东欧新成员国的民间社会援助经验,似乎非政府组织经常因脱离社区组织和运动而受到批评,但它们在幕后发挥了关键作用。在政策变更和国家转型中的作用。如果捐助者资金有针对性,它们可以促进民间社会网络的出现,通过这种网络,小型社区组织可以与规模更大,已建立并具有能力的组织联系起来。查看全文下载全文关键字科索沃,欧盟,民间社会,民主促进= {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.563119

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2011年第3期|p.707-730|共24页
  • 作者

    Adam Fagana*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号