首页> 外文期刊>Democratization >Obstacles to citizen participation by direct democracy in Latin America: a comparative regional analysis of legal frameworks and evidence from the Costa Rican case
【24h】

Obstacles to citizen participation by direct democracy in Latin America: a comparative regional analysis of legal frameworks and evidence from the Costa Rican case

机译:拉丁美洲直接民主阻碍公民参与的障碍:法律框架的比较区域分析和哥斯达黎加案件的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Starting from the 1980s, institutions of direct democracy were introduced into most Latin American constitutions. To date, the practical application of these institutions remains almost exclusively restricted to the subtype of government plebiscites while the use of citizen initiated instruments remains scarce. To explain the region's low frequency of use of citizen initiated instruments of direct democracy this explorative study proceeds in three sections. The first recapitulates regulatory legislation on, and practical experience with direct democracy in Latin America. The second proposes and applies an index for the comparative measurement of legal obstacles provided by institutional frameworks and goes on to discuss further explanatory propositions on factors that may interact with these legal obstacles to obstruct direct democratic citizen participation. Finally, these hypotheses are tested through an interview-based study with actors involved in the recent practical experience with direct democracy in Costa Rica. The study concludes that the institutional design of citizen initiated instruments of direct democracy alone does not suffice to explain the frequency of their practical application. Rather than this, application frequency appears to be a function of the combined interactive effects of legal institutional factors with sociological and political party factors such as strategic action preferences and party elites' attitudes.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdirect democracy, citizen initiatives, comparative institutions, participation, Latin AmericaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.532619
机译:从1980年代开始,大多数拉丁美洲宪法都引入了直接民主制度。迄今为止,这些机构的实际应用几乎始终仅限于政府公民投票的亚型,而使用公民发起的文书仍然很少。为了解释该地区使用公民发起的直接民主手段的频率较低,本研究分为三个部分。第一个概述了拉丁美洲的有关直接民主的监管立法和实践经验。第二部分提出并应用了一种指标,用于比较衡量制度框架所提供的法律障碍,并进一步讨论了有关可能与这些法律障碍相互作用以阻碍民主公民直接参与的因素的解释性命题。最后,这些假设通过与参与最近哥斯达黎加直接民主实践经验的演员进行的基于访谈的研究得到检验。研究得出的结论是,仅由公民发起的直接民主工具的制度设计不足以解释其实际应用的频率。而是应用频率似乎是法律制度因素与社会和政党因素(例如战略行动偏好和政党精英的态度)相结合的互动效应的函数。查看全文下载全文关键词直接民主,公民倡议,比较机构,参与,拉丁美洲相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布日期:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b” };添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.532619

著录项

  • 来源
    《Democratization》 |2011年第1期|p.100-134|共35页
  • 作者

    Anita Breuera*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号