首页> 外文期刊>Decision support systems >Risk aversion and loss aversion in core-selecting auctions
【24h】

Risk aversion and loss aversion in core-selecting auctions

机译:核心竞标中的风险规避和损失规避

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Core-selecting combinatorial auctions have been introduced as an alternative to the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism because VCG can result in payments that are not in the core with respect to bids, leading to unfair payments, unacceptably low revenues, and unstable outcomes. This raises an auction selection problem for an auctioneer deciding whether to employ a core-selecting auction or VCG mechanism in practice. The down-side of a core-selecting auction is that it is not incentive compati
机译:引入了核心选择组合拍卖作为Vickrey-Clarke-Groves(VCG)机制的替代方法,因为VCG可能导致出价方面的付款不在核心范围内,从而导致付款不公平,收入低得令人难以接受且不稳定结果。这给拍卖商提出了在实践中决定采用核心选择拍卖还是VCG机制的拍卖选择问题。核心竞标的不利之处在于,它不是激励性的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号