...
首页> 外文期刊>Cutter IT Journal >The Tao of SOA Governance
【24h】

The Tao of SOA Governance

机译:SOA治理之道

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Enterprise architecture management (EAM) and service-oriented architecture (SOA) mark two disciplines that belong to the IT plat du jour. Many organizations across the world are trying to implement SOA patterns and EA practices to reap the fruits promised by both disciplines. A typical implementation path for successful SOA adoption leads inevitably from the world of technology (using services as just another mechanism for implementing functional requirements) into the realm of architecture patterns that support strategic business-IT alignment (see and the "SOA Roadmap Template" sidebar). Yet when participating in large services portfolio implementations in complex, modern organizations, we have seen the gap that opens between EAM practices, such as enterprise release management, and the dynamic process of enterprise services portfolio development. One can experience the gap even in the case of a relatively agile approach to EA, based on iterative releases of enterprise architecture. Arguably, the disciplines in question have different origins that make them the "yin" and "yang" forces in the enterprise.
机译:企业体系结构管理(EAM)和面向服务的体系结构(SOA)标志着属于IT平台的两个学科。世界各地的许多组织都在尝试实施SOA模式和EA做法,以收获两个学科所承诺的成果。成功采用SOA的典型实施路径不可避免地从技术世界(使用服务作为实现功能需求的另一种机制)进入支持战略业务IT对齐的体系结构模式领域(请参阅“ SOA路线图模板”侧栏) )。但是,当在复杂的现代组织中参与大型服务组合的实现时,我们已经看到EAM实践(例如企业发布管理)与企业服务组合开发的动态过程之间存在着鸿沟。即使是在基于企业体系结构迭代发布的相对敏捷的EA方法中,也可以体验到这种差距。可以说,这些学科的渊源不同,使它们成为企业中的“阴”和“阳”力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号