...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Vascular Pharmacology >Editorial [Hot topic: Current Topics on Hypolipidaemic Therapy and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment (Guest Editors: Evangelos C. Rizos and Moses S. Elisaf)]
【24h】

Editorial [Hot topic: Current Topics on Hypolipidaemic Therapy and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment (Guest Editors: Evangelos C. Rizos and Moses S. Elisaf)]

机译:社论[热门话题:降血脂疗法和心血管风险评估的最新话题(来宾编辑:Evangelos C. Rizos和Moses S. Elisaf)]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Atherosclerotic vascular disease remains an enormous public health problem. Cardiovascular risk assessment and hypolipidaemic therapy were greatly advanced during the last 15 years. In fact, hypolipidaemic drugs are consistently among the top ten best-seller drugs worldwide. Although the progress in this field is enormous, there are topics still unresolved. Distinguished authors in the field were invited to give their perspective on current controversies in this supplemental issue of the Current Vascular Pharmacology journal.nnBiomarkers of kidney function include serum creatinine and more recently estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). These biomarkers and microalbuminuria predict the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) [1]. Recent analyses indicate that eGFR is a much stronger predictor of CVD than is microalbuminuria. While microalbuminuria indicates endothelial dysfunction and is associated with increased risk for CV events, its level is related more to the level of blood pressure and glycemic control than directly to the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Hence, microalbuminuria could be viewed as a biomarker but not as a risk factor for CVD, since risk factors must be an integral part of the disease pathophysiology. Conversely, while microalbuminuria is not of prognostic value to predict chronic kidney disease (CKD) outcomes, increases over time into the albuminuria range clearly indicate presence of kidney disease and are associated with a more rapid decline in kidney function. Kalaitzidis et al. proposes the concomitant evaluation of both biomarkers eGFR and albuminuria to assess kidney function and CVD risk thoroughly.
机译:动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病仍然是一个巨大的公共卫生问题。在过去的15年中,心血管风险评估和降血脂治疗得到了极大的发展。实际上,降血脂药一直是全球最畅销的十大药物之一。尽管在这一领域取得了巨大进展,但仍有一些问题尚未解决。该领域的杰出作者应邀在《当前血管药理学》(Current Vascular Pharmacology)杂志的这一增刊中发表对当前争议的看法。nn肾功能的生物标志物包括血清肌酐和最近估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。这些生物标志物和微量白蛋白尿可预测心血管疾病(CVD)的发展[1]。最近的分析表明,eGFR比微白蛋白尿更能预测CVD。微量白蛋白尿提示内皮功能障碍并与心血管事件风险增加有关,但其水平更多地与血压和血糖控制水平相关,而不是与动脉粥样硬化的病理生理学直接相关。因此,微量白蛋白尿可被视为生物标志物,而不是CVD的危险因素,因为危险因素必须是疾病病理生理学的组成部分。相反,尽管微量白蛋白尿对预测慢性肾脏病(CKD)结局没有预后价值,但随着时间的流逝,蛋白尿范围的增加清楚地表明存在肾脏疾病,并且与肾功能的更快下降有关。 Kalaitzidis等。建议同时评估生物标志物eGFR和蛋白尿,以全面评估肾脏功能和CVD风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号