首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Trends >Cultural policy indicators: reflections on the role of official statisticians in the politics of data collection
【24h】

Cultural policy indicators: reflections on the role of official statisticians in the politics of data collection

机译:文化政策指标:对官方统计学家在数据收集政治中的作用的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Cultural policy indicators are being constructed in many countries today as a consequence of reforms in public governance aimed at increasing cost-effectiveness and general efficiency as well as transparency and accountability. Drawing upon a project of the Finnish Ministry of Education, the article discusses the responsibilities of official statisticians in regard to the collection and processing of data to be used as “evidence” of the outcomes of cultural policies. Official statisticians are bound by an ethical code that emphasises the objective and independent production of information on different aspects of the economy and society. Direct involvement with the construction of cultural policy indicators may threaten the integrity of official statisticians, because such work would require close collaboration with administrators and decision makers who have their own particular interests in the cultural field. Moreover, the system of cultural statistics, which was established internationally at the turn of the 1970s, has a history of providing justification for public cultural policies. The Finnish project, in which two officials from Statistics Finland functioned in the role of commissioned experts, was officially about societal effectiveness indicators but was extended to encompass arguments for cultural policy. The final report even went as far as to propose that cultural considerations could be mainstreamed through indices and evaluation schemes covering all policy sectors. The article shows how easily official statisticians are drawn into the politics of data collection in the field of culture even when precautions are in place. The article concludes that the code of ethics of official statisticians serves as an indispensable buffer against partiality, but, to put this ideal fully into action, cultural statisticians need to develop reflexive practices that combine an applied approach and critical discourse. Such practices are similar to those outlined recently by cultural policy researchers.View full textDownload full textKeywordscultural statistics, policy indicators, evidence, performance management, societal effectiveness, statistical ethics, critical practiceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.674753
机译:今天,由于旨在提高成本效益和总体效率以及透明度和问责制的公共治理改革,许多国家正在制定文化政策指标。本文根据芬兰教育部的一个项目,讨论了官方统计人员在收集和处理数据方面的责任,这些数据将被用作文化政策成果的“证据”。官方统计人员受道德守则约束,该道德守则强调客观,独立地生产有关经济和社会各个方面的信息。直接参与文化政策指标的构建可能会威胁到官方统计人员的诚信,因为此类工作需要与在文化领域有自己特殊利益的管理人员和决策者密切合作。此外,在1970年代初在国际上建立的文化统计制度具有为公共文化政策提供理由的历史。芬兰项目由两名来自芬兰统计局的官员担任特聘专家,该项目正式涉及社会效益指标,但范围已扩大到涵盖文化政策的论点。最终报告甚至提出可以通过涵盖所有政策部门的指数和评估计划将文化考虑纳入主流。这篇文章显示了即使有预防措施,官方统计学家也很容易被文化领域的数据收集政治所吸引。文章得出的结论是,官方统计学家的道德守则是防止偏见的必不可少的缓冲,但是,为了将这一理想付诸实践,文化统计学家需要发展反思性实践,将应用的方法和批判性话语结合起来。此类做法与文化政策研究人员最近概述的做法类似。查看全文下载全文关键字文化统计,政策指标,证据,绩效管理,社会有效性,统计伦理,批判性做法相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact ::“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.674753

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cultural Trends》 |2012年第2期|p.133-147|共15页
  • 作者

    Sari Karttunena*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号