首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Studies >THE LIMITS OF DEMOCRACY
【24h】

THE LIMITS OF DEMOCRACY

机译:民主的极限

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

During 1998 Buenos Aires witnessed a singular event: in the context of a broad legal renewal, street sex work was decriminalized. This decision proved to be highly problematic though, and led to a series of juridical reformulations that culminated in the delimitation of an official red light district in 2004. Nonetheless, although it might be thought that the legalization of this area as a site for street sex work (de facto aimed at trans sex workers) would stabilize the conflict, the regulation of sex work continues to be the object of an intense political struggle and the current situation is still far from achieving a fair agreement for sex workers. Certainly, although these debates might seem focused on the legal status of sex work, they have been addressing much broader issues that appeal to profound moral beliefs that are in turn intersected by the social organization of gender and sexuality. Thus, departing from this broader scope, in this essay I will analyse the history of this legal norm for taking up the question of the performativity of sex work configured as a social practice. In this context, I will try to show the modes in which the regulation of sexual desire implied several consequences for the definition of the public space itself and, at the same time, it implied the stabilization of the parameters through which citizenry and its rights to use urban space could be determined. It is from this point of departure that I will point to the link between the definition of sex work and the configuration of a ‘legitimate sexuality’, and from here, I will show the role of sex work in the configuration of the imaginary of citizenship and the public space.View full textDownload full textKeywordssex work, transgender, sexuality, citizenship, public space, regulation, powerRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.535988
机译:1998年期间,布宜诺斯艾利斯发生了一起特殊事件:在广泛的法律更新的背景下,街头性工作合法化。但是,这一决定被证明是非常有问题的,并导致了一系列司法上的重新制定,最终在2004年划定了一个正式的红灯区。尽管如此,尽管人们可能认为该地区合法化为街头性行为场所工作(实际上是针对跨性别的性工作者)将稳定冲突,对性工作的监管仍然是激烈的政治斗争的目标,目前的状况仍远未达成对性工作者的公平协议。当然,尽管这些辩论似乎集中在性工作的法律地位上,但它们正在解决更广泛的问题,这些问题诉诸于深刻的道德观念,而道德观念又被性别和性的社会组织相交。因此,在本文的范围之外,我将分析该法律规范的历史,以探讨被配置为一种社会实践的性工作的执行性问题。在这种情况下,我将尝试说明调节性欲对公共空间本身的定义产生若干后果的模式,同时,这也暗示了公民及其权利享有的各种参数的稳定。使用城市空间可以确定。正是从这一出发点出发,我将指出性工作的定义与“合法性行为”的配置之间的联系,从这里,我将说明性工作在性工作的配置中的作用。幻想性的公民身份和公共空间。查看全文下载全文关键字性别工作,变性,性行为,公民身份,公共场所,法规,权力相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati ,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more“,发布编号:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.535988

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cultural Studies》 |2011年第2期|p.213-229|共17页
  • 作者

    Leticia Sabsay;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号