首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Studies >QUEER ISLAM AND NEW HISTORICISM
【24h】

QUEER ISLAM AND NEW HISTORICISM

机译:伊斯兰古怪与新历史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

You will remember that the project of largely American ‘New Historicism’ was committed to uncovering the repressed of texts, to unravelling Foucauldian genealogies in all their thick descriptiveness. Judith Butler leapt fully formed from Foucault's multi-volume history of sexuality, claiming that there was no such thing as ‘a sexuality’ or a ‘gender identity’ that existed before its production in discourse, and in the body experienced, performed, and analysed as a material and thus also discursive field. This essay will read into one another new work on the history of sexuality within Islamic cultures, in which a certain queering of the historical record takes place, and novelistic representations of subjectivity and embodied experience within Islam, in which a certain queering of consciousness takes place. What is revealed as ‘the difference of Islam’, I shall argue, is that everyday life is often represented as happening within the theological panopticon. Islam appears to be experienced as a particularly intense set of gazes marking what I will call an enfolded subjectivity. And yet this difference is far from an absolute one. There may be common affects represented even where sexual practices and their epistemological grids differ. What one must remain alert to is that the very mapping of identity onto sexuality both may and yet may not be happening according to Western preconceptions of this process.View full textDownload full textKeywordsbeloveds, sexuality, queer community, Islam, enfolded subjectivityRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.535983
机译:您会记得,在很大程度上,美国人的“新历史主义”项目致力于揭示文本的压制,以详尽的描述来揭示福柯族谱系。朱迪思·巴特勒(Judith Butler)从福柯的多卷性史中完全跳出来,声称在话语和身体产生之前,不存在“性”或“性别认同”之类的东西。经验,表演和分析作为物质,因此也是话语领域。本文将再读一遍关于伊斯兰文化中性历史的新著作,其中对历史记录进行了某种形式的质疑,对伊斯兰教中的主观性和具体化的经历进行了新颖的表现,其中对某种意识进行了形式化。 。我认为,揭示为“伊斯兰的不同”的是,日常生活通常被表示为发生在神学的泛光镜中。伊斯兰教似乎被注视着一系列特别强烈的注视,这标志着我称之为被包围的主观性。但是,这种差异远非绝对的差异。即使性行为及其认识论的网格不同,也可能存在共同的影响。必须保持警惕的是,根据西方人对这一过程的先入之见,身份与性之间的映射可能会也可能不会发生。查看全文下载关键词,挚爱,性,酷儿社区,伊斯兰教,被包围的主观性相关变量var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.535983

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cultural Studies》 |2011年第2期|p.147-163|共17页
  • 作者

    Donna Landry;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号