There has been a profound debate about new ways of looking on emancipatory politics among progressive political theoreticians. One of the most important consequences of this contemporary debate has been the emergence of three related controversies: transcendence versus immanence, the people versus the multitude and negative ontology versus positive ontology. Our argumentative strategy will be to present these controversies first, through Hardt and Negri's point of view, and then through a Lacanian lecture of Laclau's perspective, author who places the psychoanalysis where philosophy traditionally located ontology.View full textDownload full textKeywordstranscendence, immanence, people, multitudeRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.647645
展开▼
机译：在进步的政治理论家中，关于解放政治的新方法一直存在着深刻的辩论。这场当代辩论最重要的后果之一是出现了三个相关的争论：超越与内在，人民与群众，消极本体与正面本体。我们的论证策略将是首先通过哈特和内格里的观点提出这些争议，然后通过拉康对拉克劳的观点的演讲，作者将精神分析置于传统上哲学存在的地方。查看全文下载全文关键字超越性，内在性，人， multitudeRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2011.647645
展开▼
