首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Studies >DEBATES OVER COLONIAL MODERNITY IN EAST ASIA AND ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE
【24h】

DEBATES OVER COLONIAL MODERNITY IN EAST ASIA AND ANOTHER ALTERNATIVE

机译:关于东亚和其他替代殖民地现代性的辩论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The introduction of the term ‘colonial modernity’ in historiography of the early 1990s provided an alternative to ‘modernization theory’ and an international focus to writing about Japanese and other imperialisms on the China mainland. This neologistic phrase also raised many other questions: the historicity of the national focus versus ‘regionalism’ in Asian Studies; the role imperialist social science in US Asian studies; the project of globalizing historiography and what units of comparison - value, nation, subalterneity, etc. - were viable in global studies; and the importance of ephemera and immanent critique in colonial modernist studies. Here the essay takes earlier debates about colonial modernity and modernization theory as a given foundation. The further step is to take seriously questions of selling, buying, investing, marketing and advertising under colonial modern conditions during the mobilization of international capital into aggressive corporate form. This historical focus is a means of opening to scrutiny ephemera and its likely role among people who were reinventing their given historical conditions, creating a material and intellectually viable colonial modernity. Thus, the essay begins with a discussion of the ‘other scene of use value.’ A particularly artful mise en abyme of a modern girl advertising shows the efficacy of this ‘other scene’ as a speculative, psychoanalytically coherent, fantasy form of intellection that may have prefigured and predisposed future, compulsory, class-striated modes of consumption and regimes of modern pleasure. The avenue that ‘other scenes of use value’ open to historiography may enhance the way the term colonial modernity is used and defined. The essay's general argument thus seeks to illustrate some of the stalemates facing the colonial modernity debate and to propose another possible line for historiographic work.View full textDownload full textKeywordscolonial modernity, other scene of use value, Anderson, Meyer & Co., AMCO, General Electric in ChinaRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2012.711006
机译:1990年代初的史学中引入了“殖民现代性”一词,这为“现代化理论”提供了另一种选择,并为国际上关注在中国大陆上日本和其他帝国主义问题的写作提供了条件。这个新词还提出了许多其他问题:在亚洲研究中,国家重点与“区域主义”的历史性;帝国主义社会科学在美国亚洲研究中的作用;史学全球化项目以及在全球研究中可行的比较单位是什么,价值,国家,亚替代性等。以及短暂性和内在批判在殖民现代主义研究中的重要性。在本文中,本文以早期关于殖民地现代性和现代化理论的辩论为基础。进一步的步骤是在将国际资本调动为具有侵略性的公司形式时,认真考虑在殖民地现代条件下的销售,购买,投资,营销和广告问题。这种历史重点是对仪及其在重塑给定历史条件,创造物质上和智力上可行的殖民现代性的人们中可能扮演的角色开放的一种手段。因此,本文从对“使用价值的其他场景”的讨论开始。现代女孩广告的一个特别巧妙的误解表明,这种“其他场景”作为一种投机,心理分析的功效。连贯,幻想的智力形式,可能预示并倾向了未来的,强制性的,阶层划分的消费模式和现代娱乐方式。向史学开放的“其他使用价值场景”可能会增强术语“殖民地现代性”的使用和定义方式。因此,本文的一般性论点试图说明殖民地现代性辩论所面临的一些僵局,并为史学工作提出另一条可能的思路。全文下载全文关键词现代性,其他使用价值领域,安德森,迈耶公司,AMCO,一般中国的电力相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布日期:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2012.711006

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cultural Studies》 |2012年第5期|p.617-644|共28页
  • 作者

    Tani Barlow;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号