首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Trends >Searching for the “public” in Public Value: arts and cultural heritage in Australia
【24h】

Searching for the “public” in Public Value: arts and cultural heritage in Australia

机译:在公共价值中寻找“公共”:澳大利亚的艺术和文化遗产

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

What constitutes the value of publicly funded arts and culture heritage is a much discussed and debated subject. As the debates have gained momentum over the last decade, considerable discourse has been devoted to who should be involved in decisions about what values we should be measuring to substantiate funding from the public purse. The concept of Public Value has been of interest to these discussions because it reminds us that public funding should be spent effectively to provide benefits for citizens and that it is the duty of governments and their funded agencies collectively to achieve this end.Though Public Value emphasizes the relationship between government decision makers and the managers of public sector institutions, the role of citizens in the process of identifying and defining Public Value is both unclear and contested. This article examines what, if any, role the public play in defining Public Value within Australia's publicly funded arts and cultural heritage sector. Although evidence of increasing consultation and engagement between industry stake holders and what Moore (1995)29. Moore, M. 1995. Creating public value: Strategic management in government , Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. View all references calls “the authorizing environment” and examples of engaging the general public in identifying Public Value exist, it finds that the public view of value is not formally embedded into decision-making processes at the government policy and planning levels.View full textDownload full textKeywordsPublic Value, value, measurement, policy, consultationRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2010.515003
机译:构成公共资助的艺术和文化遗产的价值的内容是一个经过大量讨论和辩论的主题。在过去的十年中,随着辩论的兴起,关于谁应该参与决定应该衡量哪些价值以证实来自公共钱包的资金的决策,人们进行了大量讨论。公共价值的概念引起了这些讨论的关注,因为它提醒我们应该有效地利用公共资金为公民提供利益,实现这一目标是各国政府及其资助机构的集体责任。政府决策者与公共部门机构管理者之间的关系,公民在确定和界定公共价值过程中的作用既不清楚又有争议。本文探讨了公众在定义澳大利亚公共资助的艺术和文化遗产领域的公共价值中所起的作用(如果有的话)。尽管有证据表明,行业利益相关者之间的协商和参与日益增加,而Moore(1995)29。 Moore,M.,1995年。《创造公共价值:政府的战略管理》,麻省剑桥:哈佛大学出版社。查看所有提到的“授权环境”,并发现有让公众参与确定公共价值的示例,它发现,公众的价值观念并未正式嵌入政府政策和规划级别的决策过程中。查看全文下载全文关键词公共价值,价值,衡量,政策,咨询相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2010.515003

著录项

  • 来源
    《Cultural Trends》 |2010年第4期|p.273-289|共17页
  • 作者

    Carol A. Scotta*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号