首页> 外文期刊>Cultural Trends >Can subjective well-being measures be used to value policy outcomes? The example of engagement in culture
【24h】

Can subjective well-being measures be used to value policy outcomes? The example of engagement in culture

机译:可以使用主观幸福感评估政策结果吗?参与文化的例子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Economic analysis of public policy invariably requires the valuation of non-market goods. The methods conventionally relied on by economists to estimate these values are, however, subject to a number of limitations, both methodological and philosophical. Given these concerns, economists have identified alternative valuation methods, such as the use of subjective well-being (SWB) measures. SWB measures hold much promise, but face a number of challenges before they can generate policy relevant outcomes. This article illustrates these challenges by applying the SWB approach to the valuation of engagement in culture. An analysis of the British Household Panel Survey is undertaken to estimate the value of going to the cinema and attending concerts. The approach was divided into two steps. First, the SWB impact of engaging in culture was estimated. Both fixed effects and random effects models were employed, and an instrumental variable was used to control for the endogeneity of income. Second, the value of engagement was estimated as the income compensation (IC) that would generate an SWB impact equivalent to engaging in culture. Both the impact of engagement in culture on SWB and the corresponding IC are thought to be overestimates. Possible explanations for this are considered to illustrate the research that is required before the SWB approach can generate rigorous estimates of value that are useful to policy makers. First, further research is required on the relationship between income and SWB, including methods for dealing with the direct and indirect impact of income on SWB. Second, further work is required to develop reliable instrumental. Third, work is required to understand the temporal relationship between policy outcomes and SWB.View full textDownload full textKeywordsculture, method, economic evaluation, valuation, subjective well-beingRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.726786
机译:对公共政策的经济分析总是需要对非市场商品进行估价。但是,经济学家通常用来估计这些值的方法受到方法和哲学上的许多限制。鉴于这些担忧,经济学家已经确定了其他估值方法,例如使用主观幸福感(SWB)措施。 SWB措施寄予厚望,但在产生政策相关结果之前面临许多挑战。本文通过将SWB方法应用于文化参与评估来说明这些挑战。对英国家庭小组调查进行了分析,以估算去电影院和参加音乐会的价值。该方法分为两个步骤。首先,估算了SWB参与文化的影响。固定效应模型和随机效应模型都被采用,并且工具变量被用来控制收入的内生性。其次,参与的价值被估计为收入补偿(IC),它将产生与参与文化等同的SWB影响。参与文化活动对SWB和相应IC的影响都被高估了。考虑到对此可能的解释,以说明SWB方法可以生成对决策者有用的严格的价值估算之前需要进行的研究。首先,需要进一步研究收入与社会福利局之间的关系,包括处理收入对社会福利局直接和间接影响的方法。其次,需要进一步的工作来开发可靠的工具。第三,需要开展工作来理解政策成果与SWB之间的时间关系。查看全文下载全文关键字文化,方法,经济评估,估值,主观幸福感相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike ,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2012.726786

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号