首页> 外文期刊>Critical Criminology >Restoring the Victim: Emotional Reactions, Justice Beliefs, and Support for Reparation and Punishment
【24h】

Restoring the Victim: Emotional Reactions, Justice Beliefs, and Support for Reparation and Punishment

机译:恢复受害者:情感反应,正义信念以及对赔偿和惩罚的支持

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Psychological responses to criminal wrongdoing have primarily focused on the offender, particularly on how (and why) offender punishment satisfies people’s need for justice. However, the restoration of the victim presents another way in which the “psychological itch” that injustice creates can be addressed. In the present article, I discuss two lay theories of how crime victims can be restored: a belief that the harm caused to crime victims should be directly repaired (a restorative justice approach) versus a belief that victim harm should be addressed via the punishment of the offender (a retributive justice approach). These two lay theories are discussed with regard to their emotional and ideological determinants, as well as situational and chronic factors that can affect whether people adopt a reparative or punitive “justice mindset” in dealing with victim concerns (and crime in general).
机译:对犯罪行为的心理反应主要集中于罪犯,特别是罪犯的惩罚如何(以及为什么)满足人们对正义的需求。但是,受害者的康复提出了另一种方式,可以解决不公正造成的“心理瘙痒”。在本文中,我讨论了如何恢复犯罪受害者的两个基本理论:一种认为应直接修复对犯罪受害者造成的伤害(一种恢复性司法方法)的信念,另一种认为应通过惩罚犯罪来解决受害者的伤害的信念。罪犯(一种惩罚性的司法方法)。讨论了这两种非常规的理论,涉及它们的情感和意识形态决定因素,以及可能影响人们在对待受害者关注(以及一般而言的犯罪)时采用的是补偿性还是惩罚性的“正义心态”的情况和长期因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Critical Criminology》 |2012年第1期|p.9-23|共15页
  • 作者

    Dena M. Gromet;

  • 作者单位

    The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 3730 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-6340, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号