首页> 外文期刊>Cost engineering >BRINGING HOME THE BACON OVERHEAD CAL CULATIONS AND THE LAW
【24h】

BRINGING HOME THE BACON OVERHEAD CAL CULATIONS AND THE LAW

机译:带回培根的开销计算和法律

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is a continuing debate as to which formula is the appropriate one to use in calculating home office overhead costs resulting from owner caused delays. Overhead is a real cost, but in developing claim damages or seeking compensation for extraordinary changes, it is the calculation given the least attention. For home office overhead the most famous or infamous is Eichleay, but there are states which do not accept Eichleay, or times when Eichleay is inappropriate. So what then do you do? What do the courts require? How does a contract go about recovering its full costs of a delay with regard to home office and field office overhead? This presentation will also discuss the merits and foibles of several home office overhead formulas, cite relevant case law, and also list those items which may be included in field office overhead costs. This article was first presented at the 2011 AACE International Annual Meeting in Anaheim, Calif., as presentation CDR.542.
机译:关于哪个公式适合用于计算由业主造成的延误所导致的家庭办公室间接费用的争论仍在持续。间接费用是实际成本,但是在提出索赔损害赔偿或寻求对非常规变更的赔偿时,这是最没有引起重视的计算方法。对于家庭办公室开销,最著名或最臭名昭著的是Eichleay,但有些州不接受Eichleay,或者Eichleay不适当的时期。那你怎么办?法院要求什么?合同如何收回延迟的家庭办公室和现场办公室开销的全部成本?本演讲还将讨论几种家庭办公室间接费用公式的优缺点,并引用相关判例法,并列出可能包含在总部外办公室间接费用中的那些项目。本文最初在加利福尼亚州阿纳海姆举行的2011年AACE国际年会上作为CDR.542进行了介绍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号