首页> 外文期刊>Cost engineering >Forensic Schedule Analysis: Example Implementation, Part 3
【24h】

Forensic Schedule Analysis: Example Implementation, Part 3

机译:法医进度分析:示例实现,第3部分

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article was first presented at the 2012 AACE Annual Meeting in San Antonio, Texas. It was the final installment in a series of Annual Meeting presentations that presented example forensic schedule analyses, performed according to the Method Implementation Protocols outlined in AACE Recommended Practice 29R-03. This article presents the remaining analysis methods-MIPs 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, and 3.9. Each of these techniques is a variation on one of the techniques previously presented at the AACE Annual Meetings. This article focuses on comparisons between the techniques and the reasons behind the different results found in each analysis. Finally, recommendations are provided for the continued development of example analyses, the continued refinement of analysis techniques, and the development of industry consensus in the area of objective forensic schedule analysis.
机译:本文最初在德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市2012年AACE年度会议上发表。这是一系列年会演讲的最后一部分,介绍了法医时间表分析的示例,这些示例性辩论是根据AACE建议实践29R-03中概述的方法实施方案进行的。本文介绍了其余的分析方法-MIP 3.4、3.5、3.6和3.9。这些技术中的每一种都是先前在AACE年会上提出的一种技术的变体。本文着重于技术之间的比较以及每种分析中发现不同结果的原因。最后,为继续进行实例分析,不断完善分析技术以及在客观取证时间表分析领域内达成行业共识提供了建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号