...
首页> 外文期刊>Corporate Governance >Does proximity to corporate headquarters enhance directors' monitoring effectiveness? A look at financial reporting quality
【24h】

Does proximity to corporate headquarters enhance directors' monitoring effectiveness? A look at financial reporting quality

机译:靠近公司总部是否增强了董事的监督效率?看财务报告质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Research question/issue In this study, using a unique Canadian setting that relies on a principle-based corporate oversight environment and that has access to a large pool of U.S. directors, we investigate how directors' proximity to a firm's headquarters influences its financial reporting quality.Research findings/insights Our results show that financial reporting quality is higher for firms whose boards (audit committees) consist of a greater proportion of independent directors who reside close to a firm's headquarters than for firms whose boards consist of directors who are more geographically dispersed. However, among nonlocal directors, the effect of nonlocal domestic directors on financial reporting quality is similar to the effect of local directors. In contrast, compared with local directors, the presence of U.S. directors has a negative impact on financial reporting quality.Theoretical/academic implications Our results suggest that directors' proximity to corporate headquarters extends beyond geographical proximity and also reflects directors' familiarity with a firm's institutional environment. Institutional familiarity helps domestic nonlocal directors reduce information costs associated with low geographical proximity, thus providing them with access to a wider range of information sources and enhancing their monitoring ability, at least for financial reporting. In contrast, foreign directors face information costs arising from both low geographical proximity and less familiarity with the institutional environment.Practitioner/policy implications Firms should take into consideration the consequences of nominating nonlocal directors on the monitoring of financial reporting quality. In addition, regulators should take a more comprehensive approach if they impose regulations such as board diversity initiatives, as regulatory pressures often imply appointing directors farther away from headquarters.
机译:研究问题/问题在本研究中,我们使用加拿大的独特环境,该环境依赖于基于原则的公司监督环境,并且可以接触到大量美国董事,我们研究了董事与公司总部的距离如何影响其财务报告质量。研究结果/见解我们的结果表明,董事会(审计委员会)由靠近公司总部的独立董事所组成的公司的财务报告质量要比董事会由地理位置分散的董事组成的公司要高。 。但是,在非本地董事中,非本地国内董事对财务报告质量的影响与本地董事的影响相似。相比之下,与本地董事相比,美国董事的存在会对财务报告的质量产生负面影响。理论/学术影响我们的结果表明,董事与公司总部的距离超出了地理上的距离,也反映了董事对公司机构的熟悉程度环境。机构上的熟悉度可帮助国内非本地董事减少与低地理邻近度相关的信息成本,从而使他们能够访问更广泛的信息源,并增强其监督能力,至少对于财务报告而言。相比之下,外国董事面临的信息成本是由于地理位置差和对机构环境的了解不足而引起的。从业人员/政策影响公司应考虑提名非本地董事对财务报告质量的监控。此外,如果监管机构强加诸如董事会多元化举措之类的法规,则应该采取更全面的方法,因为监管压力常常意味着任命离总部更远的董事。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号