...
首页> 外文期刊>Contributions to Political Economy >FINANCE VS OWNERSHIP: MILL'S TWO ABSTINENCES AND THE LINK BETWEEN PROFIT AND INTEREST
【24h】

FINANCE VS OWNERSHIP: MILL'S TWO ABSTINENCES AND THE LINK BETWEEN PROFIT AND INTEREST

机译:财务与所有权:磨坊的两次缺席以及利润与利益之间的联系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The difference between profit and interest was never clarified by the early classicalists, but J. S. Mill provided a partial answer: It was based on his two concepts of “abstinence”. Interest was the reward for anonymous or “contract” personal saving without ownership—savings' financial function—while profit was the reward for personal saving to increase ownership. Although he focused on abstinence in the Seniorian tradition, Mill emphasized personal, not business, saving, as did Senior. Furthermore, Mill's “abstinence theory of interest and profit” has never been taken seriously as a complete theory, as has Senior's. This was because of his “loanable” funds' theory of interest, which was taken up by later writers. It is shown that this theory predicted that net profits and interest would vary indirectly. It used the net profit to help determine the interest rate, so it perpetuated the confusion between these two rates.
机译:早期的古典主义者从来没有阐明利润和利息之间的区别,但J. S. Mill提供了部分答案:这是基于他的两个“节制”概念。利息是对无所有权的匿名或“契约”个人储蓄的奖励(储蓄的财务功能),而利润是对个人储蓄增加所有权的奖励。尽管穆尔(Mill)着重于节制的节制,但米尔(Mill)强调了个人储蓄,而不是业务,就像年长者一样。此外,密尔的“利息和利润节制理论”从未像高级论者那样被视为完整理论。这是因为他的“可贷”基金的利息理论被后来的作家所接受。结果表明,该理论预测净利润和利息将间接变化。它使用净利润来帮助确定利率,因此使这两种利率之间的混淆永久存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号