首页> 外文期刊>Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies >Confronting ‘choiceless choices’ in Holocaust videotestimonies: Judgement, ‘privileged’ Jews, and the role of the interviewer
【24h】

Confronting ‘choiceless choices’ in Holocaust videotestimonies: Judgement, ‘privileged’ Jews, and the role of the interviewer

机译:在大屠杀视频证词中面对“无选择的选择”:审判,“特权”犹太人和面试官的角色

获取原文
           

摘要

‘Privileged’ Jews include those prisoners in the camps and ghettos who held positions which gave them access to material and other benefits. Subject to extreme levels of coercion, these victims were compelled to act in ways that have been judged as both self-serving and harmful to fellow inmates. Such situations, which exemplify what influential theorist Lawrence Langer terms ‘choiceless choices’, are the chief concern of Primo Levi's paradigmatic essay on the ‘grey zone’. In light of these key conceptualizations of the ethical dilemmas of Holocaust victims, the paper analyses the representation of ‘privileged’ Jews in several videotestimonies recorded at the Jewish Holocaust Museum and Research Centre (JHMRC) in Melbourne, Australia. It will be shown that judgements of victims in extremis cause considerable problems for attempts to testify to the complex situations and experiences of ‘privileged’ Jews. The role of the interviewer is a crucial factor in this, particularly when interviewers are themselves Holocaust survivors. The paper reveals that while it might be argued that moral evaluations of ‘privileged’ Jews should be suspended, judgements are often imposed on Holocaust testimonies in various ways and have a significant impact on their content.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10304310903362783
机译:“有特权的”犹太人包括那些在营地和贫民窟里的囚犯,他们担任过职务,使他们能够获得物质和其他福利。在极端的胁迫之下,这些受害者被迫采取被认为既自私自利又对犯人有害的方式行事。这种情况体现了有影响力的理论家劳伦斯·朗格所说的“无选择的选择”,是普里莫·列维在“灰色地带”上的范式论文的主要关注点。根据对大屠杀受害者道德困境的这些关键概念化,本文分析了澳大利亚墨尔本犹太人大屠杀博物馆和研究中心(JHMRC)录制的几段视频证词中“特权”犹太人的代表。结果表明,对极端受害者的判断会给证明“特权”犹太人的复杂处境和经历带来很大麻烦。访调员的角色是其中的关键因素,特别是当访调员本身就是大屠杀幸存者时。该论文表明,尽管可能会争论应该暂停对“特权”犹太人的道德评价,但往往以各种方式对大屠杀的证词做出判断,并对其内容产生重大影响。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10304310903362783

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号