...
首页> 外文期刊>Concrete Openings >OSHA's Multi-Employer Worksite Doctrine Update: Civil and Criminal Liability
【24h】

OSHA's Multi-Employer Worksite Doctrine Update: Civil and Criminal Liability

机译:OSHA的多雇主工作场所原则更新:民事和刑事责任

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Multi-employer worksites have long complicated labor and employment law compliance, raising difficult questions as to which company constitutes an employee's "employer" for purposes of federal and state law. The NLRB has taken a rigorous approach, targeting multi-employer worksites and finding alleged "joint employers" liable for labor law violations. The federal Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) is even more aggressive. For years, OSHA has advanced a policy at worksites, particularly construction sites, under which it can cite direct employers, general contractors, consultants and temporary employers for a single safety or health violation. We can expect OSHA to focus this special enforcement agenda at multi-employer worksites, targeting temporary employees and subcontractors. Because of new regulations, employers on multi-employer worksites face increased fines, costly abatement responsibilities and potential criminal liability.
机译:多雇主的工作场所长期以来很复杂地遵守劳动法和劳动法,就联邦和州法律的目的,哪个公司构成雇员的“雇主”提出了难题。 NLRB采取了严格的措施,针对多雇主工作地点,并认定涉嫌违反劳动法的“联合雇主”。联邦职业健康与安全管理局(OSHA)更具进取心。多年来,OSHA在工作场所,尤其是建筑工地,已经提出了一项政策,根据该政策,可以列举直接雇主,总承包商,顾问和临时雇主的单一安全或健康违规行为。我们可以期望OSHA将这个特殊的执法议程集中在多雇主工作现场,针对临时雇员和分包商。由于有新规定,多雇主工作场所的雇主面临罚款增加,减排责任高昂和潜在的刑事责任。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Concrete Openings》 |2016年第3期|24-25|共2页
  • 作者

    Mark A. Lies; Adam R. Young;

  • 作者单位

    Environmental, Safety and Toxic Tort Group in the Chicago office of Seyfarth Shaw LLP;

    Labor and Employment and Environmental, Safety and Toxic Tort Groups of Seyfarth Shaw LLP;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号