首页> 外文期刊>Computers in Human Behavior >When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons
【24h】

When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons

机译:当图形改善喜好但不学习在线课程时

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The multimedia principle states that adding graphics to text can improve student learning (Mayer, 2009), but all graphics are not equally effective. In the present study, students studied a short online lesson on distance education that contained instructive graphics (i.e., directly relevant to the instructional goal), seductive graphics (i.e., highly interesting but not directly relevant to the instructional goal), decorative graphics (i.e., neutral but not directly relevant to the instructional goal), or no graphics. Following instruction, students who received any kind of graphic produced significantly higher satisfaction ratings than the no graphics group, indicating that adding any kind of graphic greatly improves positive feelings. However, on a recall posttest, students who received instructive graphics performed significantly better than the other three groups, indicating that the relevance of graphics affects learning outcomes. The three kinds of graphics had similar effects on affective measures but different effects on cognitive measures. Thus, the multimedia effect is qualified by a version of the coherence principle: Adding relevant graphics to words helps learning but adding irrelevant graphics does not.
机译:多媒体原理指出,在文本中添加图形可以改善学生的学习能力(Mayer,2009年),但是所有图形效果都不一样。在本研究中,学生学习了有关远程教育的简短在线课程,其中包含指导性图形(即,与教学目标直接相关),诱人的图形(即,非常有趣但与教学目标不直接相关),装饰性图形(即, ,中性但与教学目标没有直接关系),或没有图形。按照指示,与没有图形组相比,接受任何图形的学生所获得的满意度要高得多,这表明添加任何图形都可以极大地改善积极情绪。但是,在回想后测中,收到指导性图形的学生的表现明显优于其他三组,这表明图形的相关性会影响学习效果。三种图形对情感测量的影响相似,但对认知测量的影响却不同。因此,多媒体效果可以通过一种连贯性原则来加以限定:在单词中添加相关图形有助于学习,而添加不相关图形则不能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号