首页> 外文期刊>Computers and Composition >Reflection(s) In/On Digital Writing's Hybrid Pedagogy, 2010-2017
【24h】

Reflection(s) In/On Digital Writing's Hybrid Pedagogy, 2010-2017

机译:2010-2017年数字写作中/混合写作教学中的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Composition and Computers and Writing scholarship often provide theoretical and practical articulations of how we could or should teach students to use the technologies necessary to engage in digital writing. Sometimes those theoretical and practical articulations differ. For example, syllabi and scholarship diverge in their representation of reflective pedagogy. I identified this divergence upon assembling a set of 150 publicly available digital writing syllabi and applying descriptive, identifying, and analytical tags to those syllabi related to how each represents to its students how they will learn how to use digital technologies in that course. I found that, aside from the divergence vis a vis reflective pedagogy, digital writing syllabi represent the use of practices (direct instruction, experimentation, critical analysis) that align with those promoted by pedagogical scholarship.
机译:作文,计算机和写作奖学金通常会就如何或应该教给学生使用从事数字写作的必要技术提供理论和实践方面的阐述。有时,这些理论和实践的表述是不同的。例如,教学大纲和学术在反映性教学法的表现形式上是不同的。我通过组装一组150个可公开获得的数字写作教学大纲,并对这些教学大纲应用了描述性,识别性和分析性标签来发现这种差异,这些标记涉及每个人如何向学生表示如何在该课程中学习如何使用数字技术。我发现,除了在反思性教学法上的分歧外,数字写作大纲还代表着与教学法学者所倡导的实践(直接指导,实验,批判性分析)的使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号