...
首页> 外文期刊>Computer law & security report >Tying and bundling by online platforms -Distinguishing between lawful expansion strategies and anti-competitive practices
【24h】

Tying and bundling by online platforms -Distinguishing between lawful expansion strategies and anti-competitive practices

机译:通过在线平台捆绑和捆绑 - 合法扩张战略与反竞争实践之间的区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The assessment of tying and bundling practices under Art. 102 TFEU in the case of online platforms will require adjusting current practice to correspond to their technical complexity and multi sided nature. Although the current framework may appear suitable to deal with this kind of abuses, The recent cases against Google show that there is still much uncertainty in practice. Therefore this article seeks to address the matter of tying and bundling by online platforms and provide guidance with regard to the application of the current legal framework to such complex cases in order to prevent false finding in ongoing and future cases.This article shows that finding an abuse of dominance in platform related cases requires great diligence as the joint provision of products or services and market power leveraging by platforms is an inherent part of their commercial evolvement. In this regard the article offers insight on how to distinguish between anticompetitive tying and bundling practices and legitimate expansion strategies. In order to do so, the article discusses how such practices can manifest and how they should be addressed under the framework of EU competition law in light of the similar competitive concerns they share with non-platform cases. (C) 2020 Daniel Mandrescu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
机译:艺术中捆绑和捆绑实践的评估。 102 TFEU在线平台的情况下,需要调整当前的实践,以符合其技术复杂性和多面性质。虽然目前的框架可能出现适合处理这种滥用行为,但最近对谷歌的案件表明实践中仍有很大的不确定性。因此,本文旨在解决通过在线平台捆绑和捆绑的问题,并在持续和未来案件中防止虚假发现,为目前的法律框架申请提供指导。这篇文章显示了在平台相关案例中滥用统治地位需要艰巨的勤奋,因为通过平台的产品或服务和市场力量的联合提供是商业演变的固有部分。在这方面,文章有关如何区分反竞争和捆绑实践和合法扩张策略的见解。为此,文章讨论了这些做法如何表明以及如何根据与非平台案件共享类似的竞争顾问,根据欧盟竞争法的框架解决。 (c)2020 Daniel Mandrescu。由elsevier有限公司出版。这是CC的开放式访问文章,由许可证(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号